SHC dismisses PPP MNA Bijar’s plea
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday dismissed Pakistan Peoples Party MNA Jam Karim Bijar's plea, seeking protection against placement of his name in the Exit Control List and Provincial National Identification List as not maintainable.
The PPP MNA, who left for Dubai after the murder of social activist Nazim Jokhio and was declared as an absconder by the police, submitted in the petition that he was granted 10 days protective bail in the case and wanted to return to the country to surrender before the trial court.
He submitted that soon after granting of protective bail, Interior Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed called a press conference and issued threats to him and made a statement that he will be arrested on his arrival in the country, which is also contempt of the court orders.
The petitioner submitted that he also came to know that official respondents have put together various teams at Karachi and Islamabad airports for the purpose of arresting the petitioner upon his arrival.
He said that Governor Sindh also issued a letter to director general FIA to include his name in the Provincial National Identification List to ensure his presence in the relevant court of the law in the larger public interest.
He submitted the government was also fearing a no confidence motion and all this action was being done to stall any possibility of the petitioner’s reaching the National Assembly and to gain politically due to his absence.
The court was requested to restrain the respondents from placing his name in ECL, PNIL or from arresting him in any other FIR upon his arrival in the country.
The SHC's division bench, headed by Justice Mohammad Iqbal Kalhoro after hearing the arguments of the counsel, observed that the court had already granted protective bail to the petitioner for 10 days and such an order was neither recalled or set aside by the Supreme Court.
The court observed that nothing was shown on record that the letter issued by the Sindh governor has been acted upon by the FIA or whether the name of the petitioner has been placed in the PNIL. The court dismissed the petition as not maintainable.
-
Apple Foldable IPhone Tipped For 2026 Launch With A20 Pro Chip And C2 Modem -
Meghan Lends Credence To Reports Of Rift With Kim Kardashian On Chicago's Birthday -
Florida Woman’s Alleged Bid To Bribe Police Ends In Unexpected Discovery -
James Van Der Beek Strongly Opposes The Idea Of New Year In Winter -
Elon Musk’s Starlink Rival Eutelsat Partners With MaiaSpace For Satellite Launches -
Fans Feel For Leonardo DiCaprio As He Gets Awkwardly Snubbed: Watch -
Japan Launches The World’s First Trial To Extract Rare Earth Elements -
Prince Harry Breaks Cover In California Amid Tension At Home With Meghan Markle -
ASAP Rocky Makes Massive Comeback With New Album -
Amanda Seyfried Unveils How Channing Tatum Teased Her On 'Dear John' Set -
Blue Moon 2026: Everything You Need To Know -
UN Warns Of 10-year Worst Hunger Crisis In Nigeria After Massive Aid Cuts -
Dolly Parton Drops New Version Of Her 1977 Hit 'Light Of A Clear Blue Morning' -
Redmi Note 15 Pro+5G Set For Global Rollout With Power-packed Features -
Meghan Markle Sparks Huge Tension With Harry At Home: 'At A Critical Crossroads' -
Insurrection Act Of 1807: All You Need To Know About Powerful US Emergency Law