Fixation of minimum sugarcane price: SHC dismisses sugar mills’ plea
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed by the sugar mill owners against fixation of minimum price of sugarcane by the Agriculture Supply and Price Department, observing that price fixation was done within the framework of Sugar Factories Control Act.
The Mirpurkhas Sugar Mill and others had challenged the issuance of the government notification with regard to fixation of minimum sugarcane price. The plaintiffs counsel submitted that price fixation of sugarcane was not fixed under Section 16-A of the Act as neither recommendations of the board were adhered to nor consideration for fixation of minimum price on the basis of Section 16-A and 16-B of the Act were followed. They submitted that the board meeting held to fix the price was a coram non judice as the secretary Agriculture, Supply and Price Department was absent and that too would render the meeting of the Sugarcane Control Board for fixation of minimum price as unlawful.
The Sindh Abadgar Board opposed the case and submitted that the cabinet deliberated on the fixation of minimum purchase price of sugarcane and the provisions of 16-A and 16-B of the Act were not violated, in fact, complied with in letter and spirit.
The SHC’s single bench, comprising Justice Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui, after hearing the arguments of the counsel, observed that the cabinet deliberated and fixed the minimum price on the strength of Section 16-A and 16-B of the Act 1950 i.e. the cost of production of the sugarcane and the return of the growers from alternate crops and the general trend of prices of the agricultural commodities.
The court observed that the plaintiffs’ counsel, during the course of their arguments, had not attributed any malafide as far as the fixation of the minimum price by the Sindh government; however, it is only argued that the cost of production of the sugarcane and return to the growers from alternative crops were not taken into consideration. The court observed that the minimum price
sugarcane as fixed by the Sindh government on November 4, 2021 was within the frame of Section 16 of the Act, 1950 and dismissed the lawsuits of sugar mills owners.
-
Lana Del Rey Announces New Single Co-written With Husband Jeremy Dufrene -
Ukraine-Russia Talks Heat Up As Zelenskyy Warns Of US Pressure Before Elections -
Lil Nas X Spotted Buying Used Refrigerator After Backlash Over Nude Public Meltdown -
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters -
Candace Cameron Bure Says She’s Supporting Lori Loughlin After Separation From Mossimo Giannulli -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are ‘not Innocent’ In Epstein Drama -
Reese Witherspoon Goes 'boss' Mode On 'Legally Blonde' Prequel -
Chris Hemsworth And Elsa Pataky Open Up About Raising Their Three Children In Australia -
Record Set Straight On King Charles’ Reason For Financially Supporting Andrew And Not Harry -
Michael Douglas Breaks Silence On Jack Nicholson's Constant Teasing -
How Prince Edward Was ‘bullied’ By Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor -
'Kryptonite' Singer Brad Arnold Loses Battle With Cancer -
Gabourey Sidibe Gets Candid About Balancing Motherhood And Career