SHC restrains KMC, KDA from razing homes in Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony
The Sindh High Court on Friday restrained the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation, the Karachi Development Authority and others from taking any action against the residents of Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony’s properties till further orders.
The interim order came on a lawsuit of Anwar Ali and other residents against the demolition drive of the KMC and the KDA in the name of Supreme Court orders. The plaintiffs submitted that they were owners of their homes located in the notified Katchi Abadi Gulshan-e-Mustafa situated in Federal B Area’s Block 15, spread over 12 acres. They said the Katchi Abadi was notified and the lease deed was executed by the Katchi Abadi Authority in favour of the plaintiffs.
They further said the KMC and KDA authorities were wrongfully acting “in the garb of Supreme Court orders”, as their properties did not fall within Plot ST-14, Block 16. They noted that they were not encroachers, had valid leases, and their land was around two kilometres from the ST-14 plot, which was the subject matter of the Supreme Court proceedings.
They residents complained that the KMC and KDA authorities without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing were taking steps towards demolishing their houses, evicting them from their lawfully owned homes, and had marked them for demolition.
The plaintiffs’ counsel submitted that it was apparent from the record that the SC had specified in its order that on ST-14 Plot in Block-15, Scheme 16, situated on Rashid Minhas Road adjacent to the UBL Sports Complex, some places construction work was being carried out.
He contended that the respondents could not carry out any demolition work against the leased and lawful properties of the citizens having lawful construction on the duly allotted lands, and that acts of the respondenants were a violation of articles 23 and 24 of the constitution.
The court issued notices to the respondants and in the meantime restrained the KMC, the KDA and others from taking any action against the plaintiffs and/or their properties as mentioned in the lawsuit till the next date of the hearing, which was fixed on June 28.
-
Lewis Capaldi Sends Taylor Swift Sweet Message After 'Opalite' Video Role -
Sarah Ferguson Joins Andrew In ‘forcing’ Their Daughters Hand: ‘She Can Lose Everything’ -
'Bridgerton' Author Reveals If Actors Will Be Recast In Future Seasons -
50 Cent Super Bowl Ad Goes Viral -
'The Housemaid' Lifts Company's Profits: Here's How -
Michael Douglas Recalls Director's Harsh Words Over 'Wall Street' Performance -
Henry Czerny On Steve Martin Created Humor On 'Pink Panther' Set -
Lady Victoria Hervey: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Ex-girlfriend Proud Of Being On Epstein Files -
Huawei Could Revive Chip Technology If US Lets Guard Down, Intel CEO Says -
Dolly Parton Created One Of Her Iconic Tracks With Acrylic Nails? -
Parents Alarmed As Teens Form Emotional Bonds With AI Companion Chatbots -
Denzel Washington Surprises LeBron James -
Cillian Murphy's Hit Romantic Drama Exits Prime Video: Here's Why -
Paris Hilton Reveals What Keeps Her Going In Crazy Schedule -
Deep Freeze Returning To Northeastern United States This Weekend: 'Dangerous Conditions' -
Inside Dylan Efron's First 'awful' Date With Girlfriend Courtney King