SHC restrains KMC, KDA from razing homes in Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony
The Sindh High Court on Friday restrained the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation, the Karachi Development Authority and others from taking any action against the residents of Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony’s properties till further orders.
The interim order came on a lawsuit of Anwar Ali and other residents against the demolition drive of the KMC and the KDA in the name of Supreme Court orders. The plaintiffs submitted that they were owners of their homes located in the notified Katchi Abadi Gulshan-e-Mustafa situated in Federal B Area’s Block 15, spread over 12 acres. They said the Katchi Abadi was notified and the lease deed was executed by the Katchi Abadi Authority in favour of the plaintiffs.
They further said the KMC and KDA authorities were wrongfully acting “in the garb of Supreme Court orders”, as their properties did not fall within Plot ST-14, Block 16. They noted that they were not encroachers, had valid leases, and their land was around two kilometres from the ST-14 plot, which was the subject matter of the Supreme Court proceedings.
They residents complained that the KMC and KDA authorities without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing were taking steps towards demolishing their houses, evicting them from their lawfully owned homes, and had marked them for demolition.
The plaintiffs’ counsel submitted that it was apparent from the record that the SC had specified in its order that on ST-14 Plot in Block-15, Scheme 16, situated on Rashid Minhas Road adjacent to the UBL Sports Complex, some places construction work was being carried out.
He contended that the respondents could not carry out any demolition work against the leased and lawful properties of the citizens having lawful construction on the duly allotted lands, and that acts of the respondenants were a violation of articles 23 and 24 of the constitution.
The court issued notices to the respondants and in the meantime restrained the KMC, the KDA and others from taking any action against the plaintiffs and/or their properties as mentioned in the lawsuit till the next date of the hearing, which was fixed on June 28.
-
Charli XCX Reveals ‘confusing’ Toll ‘Brat’ Popularity Took On Her -
Android Phones At Risk: PromptSpy Malware Exploits AI -
Barry Manilow Gives Insight Into 'very Depressing' Doctor Visit As He Postpones 2026 Arena Tour Due To Cancer -
Margot Robbie Opens Up About Imposter Syndrome ‘crisis’ -
'Desperate' Sarah Ferguson Won't Go Down Without A Fight -
Prince William, Kate Face Major Challenge To Repair Monarchy Reputation After Andrew Arrest -
Hidden ‘dark Galaxy' Traced By Ancient Star Clusters Could Rewrite The Cosmic Galaxy Count -
Eric Dane 'really Wanted To Talk About His Daughters' In His Final Netflix Interview Before Death -
AI Superintelligence Race: Meta And Microsoft Back Rival Visions—Who Will Win? -
Chatbots Push Users Into ‘delusional Spirals,’ Experts Warn -
Economist Slams AI Doom Predictions, ‘replacing Humans Is Not Innovation’ -
KATSEYE's Manon Bannerman Takes Break From Group For Personal Reasons -
Prince Harry's Reaction On 'disgraced' Uncle Andrew Arrest Revealed -
Eric Dane’s Friends Initiate GoFundMe To 'support' His Two Daughters After His Death At 53 -
Internet Erupts After Candace Owens Claims Elon Musk And Sam Altman Are ‘not Human’ -
Will Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Stay In Contact With Andrew? Source Speaks Out