SHC restrains KMC, KDA from razing homes in Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony
The Sindh High Court on Friday restrained the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation, the Karachi Development Authority and others from taking any action against the residents of Gulshan-e-Mustafa Colony’s properties till further orders.
The interim order came on a lawsuit of Anwar Ali and other residents against the demolition drive of the KMC and the KDA in the name of Supreme Court orders. The plaintiffs submitted that they were owners of their homes located in the notified Katchi Abadi Gulshan-e-Mustafa situated in Federal B Area’s Block 15, spread over 12 acres. They said the Katchi Abadi was notified and the lease deed was executed by the Katchi Abadi Authority in favour of the plaintiffs.
They further said the KMC and KDA authorities were wrongfully acting “in the garb of Supreme Court orders”, as their properties did not fall within Plot ST-14, Block 16. They noted that they were not encroachers, had valid leases, and their land was around two kilometres from the ST-14 plot, which was the subject matter of the Supreme Court proceedings.
They residents complained that the KMC and KDA authorities without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing were taking steps towards demolishing their houses, evicting them from their lawfully owned homes, and had marked them for demolition.
The plaintiffs’ counsel submitted that it was apparent from the record that the SC had specified in its order that on ST-14 Plot in Block-15, Scheme 16, situated on Rashid Minhas Road adjacent to the UBL Sports Complex, some places construction work was being carried out.
He contended that the respondents could not carry out any demolition work against the leased and lawful properties of the citizens having lawful construction on the duly allotted lands, and that acts of the respondenants were a violation of articles 23 and 24 of the constitution.
The court issued notices to the respondants and in the meantime restrained the KMC, the KDA and others from taking any action against the plaintiffs and/or their properties as mentioned in the lawsuit till the next date of the hearing, which was fixed on June 28.
-
Apple Developing AI Pendant Powered By In-house Visual Models -
'Gilmore Girls' Milo Ventimiglia Shares How He Would React If His Daughter Ke'ala Coral Chose 'team Dean' -
New AGI Benchmark: Demis Hassabis Proposes ‘Einstein Test’—Ultimate Challenge To Prove True Intelligence -
NASA Artemis 2 Moon Mission Faces Unexpected Delay Ahead Of March Launch -
Kate Middleton Reclaims Spotlight With Confidence Amid Andrew Drama -
Lady Gaga Details How Eating Disorder Affected Her Career: 'I Had To Stop' -
Why Elon Musk Believes Guardrails Or Kill Switches Won’t Save Humanity From AI Risks -
'Devastated' Richard E. Grant Details How A Friend Of Thirty Years Betrayed Him: 'Such Toxicity' -
Rider Strong Finally Unveils Why He Opposed The Idea Of Matthew Lawrence’s Inclusion In 'Boy Meets World' -
Who Was ‘El Mencho’? Inside The Rise And Fall Of Mexico’s Most Wanted Drug Lord Killed In Military Operation -
Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman Mend Their Relationship Following The Murder Of Rob Reiner, Wife Michelle Reiner? -
Kate Middleton May Break Because Of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor & Expert Speaks Out -
Celebrities Who Struggle With Infertility -
Is Social Media Addiction Real? Experts Explain Signs And How To Cut Back -
Can App Stores Really Keep Kids Off Social Media? Here’s What Experts Says -
Margot Robbie Fears Being Dubbed A 'dumb Blonde' Due To Major Reasons: 'Hates The Idea'