SHC restrains Cantonment Board Faisal from taking action against shop owners
The Sindh High Court (SHC) has restrained the Cantonment Board Faisal from taking any adverse action against the owners of shops situated in the Millennium Mall in respect of property tax and conversancy charges.
The interim order came in recent days on a petition of the Millennium Mall management that challenged the issuance of property tax and conservancy charges by the cantonment board for the year 2020-21 to various owners of shops at the mall.
Counsel for the petitioner Salahuddin Ahmed submitted that the federal government or cantonment board could not charge or collect the property tax in respect of the properties situated in Sindh after the 18th amendment.
The counsel submitted that the impugned challans/demand notices were otherwise illegal and without lawful authority as the annual rental value of the subject property had been enhanced in violation of law without calling objections.
He submitted that similar petitions containing similar controversy were already pending before the court wherein notices had been issued to respondents and they had been restrained from taking any adverse action against the petitioners pursuant to the similar impugned challans/demand notices.
The lawyer submitted that the notice of the instant petition may be issued to the respondents and the same may be taken up along with the identical connected petitions.
The SHC drew attention of the counsel to the fact that the instant petition was filed by the Millennium Mall management without impleading the relevant owners of shops against whom the impugned challans/demand notices had been issued under the Section 91 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, and hence the shop owners were required to be impleaded for claiming any interim or final relief in accordance with law.
The counsel requested the high court to allow him to file an amended title by impleading the relevant owners of shops as petitioners and affix the court’s fees accordingly within seven days.
Granting the request, the SHC issued pre-admission notice to the Faisal Cantonment, federal government and others and called their comments on May 24. In the meantime, the court ordered that respondents shall not take any adverse action against the petitioners against whom impugned challans/demand notices were issued.
-
Can App Stores Really Keep Kids Off Social Media? Here’s What Experts Says -
Margot Robbie Fears Being Dubbed A 'dumb Blonde' Due To Major Reasons: 'Hates The Idea' -
How Kate Middleton's Hyperemesis Gravidarum Left Her 'not The Happiest' -
USA Beats Canada For First Olympic Hockey Gold In 46 Years; Donald Trump, Barack Obama & Others Hail Historic Victory -
Claressa Shields Defeats Franchon Crews-Dezurn In Heavyweight Title Rematch -
Sam Altman Calls Elon Musk’s Space Data Center Plan ‘ridiculous’ -
Kara Braxton, WNBA All-Star And Champion, Dies At 43 -
Anthropic Lead Engineer Predicts ‘software Engineer’ Role Can Disappear By 2026 -
Sharon Details Late Husband Ozzy's Final Days During His Sickness -
Magic Vs Clippers: Clippers Announce Kawhi Leonard Status After Exit -
BTC Price Today: Bitcoin Sinks Below $65K On Trade Uncertainty -
'A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms': All You Need To Know About The Finale -
NYC Travel Ban: Mamdani Shuts Down Roads Amid Blizzard Conditions -
Alicia Keys Celebrates 25 Years Of Breakout Single ‘Fallin’’ -
Akinola Davies Jr. Gives His Immigrant Parents A Shoutout In 2026 BAFTAs Acceptance Speech -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Told 'first Thing They Should Do' After Andrew Arrest