SHC directs counsel to argue: Whether SC order for non-release of Omer Sheikh still effective
KARACHI: Sindh High Court (SHC) on Wednesday directed counsel to argue as to whether any interim stay order in Supreme Court with regard to non- release of Ahmed Omer Sheikh and three others in Daniel Pearl murder case is still in field or not.
The direction came on contempt of court application against chief secretary, special home secretary and jail authorities filed by Ahmed Omer Sheikh and others for not releasing them despite court orders.
The SHC on December 24 had struck down preventive detention of British nationality holder Ahmed Omer Saeed Sheikh and three others who were continuously detained for last nine months under anti terrorism law despite their acquittal in US journalist Daniel Pearl kidnapping and murder charges by the appellate court.
Petitioner counsel Nadeem Azar filed contempt of court application on behalf of petitioners submitting that the jail authorities, home secretary and chief secretary deliberately and willfully defied the court orders on December 24 and requested the court to proceed against them under contempt of court proceedings and punished them for defying the court orders. SHC’s division bench headed by Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto took exception over non-appearance of alleged contemnor chief secretary Mumtaz Ali Shah. Additional advocate general submitted that advocate general Sindh was engaged before Supreme Court and sought adjourned on his behalf.
The court directed the counsel to argue as to whether any interim stay order in Supreme Court with regard to non- release of Ahmed Omer Sheikh and three others in Daniel Pearl murder case is still in field or not. The court directed all alleged contemnors to appear before the court and adjourned the hearing till January 20. Advocate General Sindh had earlier submitted that state appeals against acquittal of the petitioners have been pending before the Supreme Court and court had on September 28 had ordered that respondents may not be released and such order is still in field as same has not been expressly recalled.
The court had observed that instant application has been filed against violation of the court orders and court will examine as whether any interim stay order has been issued by the SC with regard to release of petitioners was in field or not.
-
How Liam Payne’s Death Impacted Awareness About Mental Health -
Scientists Reveal How Sleeping Can Unlock Your Creative Potential -
OpenAI CEO Calls AI Water Concerns ‘fake’ -
Taylor Swift Expresses How Negative Body Comments Triggered Her -
Prince William Plans Bold Shake-up To Restore Public Trust Amid Andrew Drama -
Apple IPhone 18 Pro Series To Launch In Bold Red Colour: Report -
Apple Developing AI Pendant Powered By In-house Visual Models -
'Gilmore Girls' Milo Ventimiglia Shares How He Would React If His Daughter Ke'ala Coral Chose 'team Dean' -
New AGI Benchmark: Demis Hassabis Proposes ‘Einstein Test’—Ultimate Challenge To Prove True Intelligence -
NASA Artemis 2 Moon Mission Faces Unexpected Delay Ahead Of March Launch -
Kate Middleton Reclaims Spotlight With Confidence Amid Andrew Drama -
Lady Gaga Details How Eating Disorder Affected Her Career: 'I Had To Stop' -
Why Elon Musk Believes Guardrails Or Kill Switches Won’t Save Humanity From AI Risks -
'Devastated' Richard E. Grant Details How A Friend Of Thirty Years Betrayed Him: 'Such Toxicity' -
Rider Strong Finally Unveils Why He Opposed The Idea Of Matthew Lawrence’s Inclusion In 'Boy Meets World' -
Who Was ‘El Mencho’? Inside The Rise And Fall Of Mexico’s Most Wanted Drug Lord Killed In Military Operation