SHC restrains PIA from coercive action against pilots
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court has restrained Pakistan International Airlines Corporation from taking any adverse or coercive action against the pilots in violation of the PIA laws that provides protection of the salary structure.
The direction came on lawsuit filed by Pakistan Airlines Pilots Association and other pilots against the PIAC orders of change in the established fixed salary structure of the pilots.
The plaintiffs counsel Haseeb Jamali submitted that PIA management through impugned admin orders issued on October 27 and November 3 was attempting to not only drastically change the established fixed salary structure of pilots but also attempting to cut down their sanctioned off days. The PIAC, they submitted was also trying to introduce new punitive actions for safety violations which were violative of the good practices of international civil aviation authority.
Referring to section 3(6) of the PIA (conversion) Act 2016, the defence counsel said that all employees of the corporation shall remain entitled to the same remuneration and other conditions of service, rights and privileges including pension, provident funds and gratuity.
He submitted that through the defendents the impugned admin order changed and reduced the flying allowance of 75 hours and 10 days off to 50 hours and 5 days off with effect from October 1, 2020. Furthermore the privilege leave was also changed besides denying increase in flying allowance to pilots for two years. The court was requested to set aside the impugned admin orders and restrain the respondents from taking any coercive action against the plaintiffs.
The SHC’s single bench headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi after preliminary hearing issued notices to the PIA and others and called their comments on November 25. The court in meantime restrained the PIA from taking any adverse or coercive action against the plaintiffs in violation of section 3(6) of PIA (conversion) Act.
-
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion -
'Percy Jackson' Star Feels Relieved After Season Two Finale -
Jelly Roll Reveals How Weight Loss Changed Him As A Dad: 'Whole Different Human' -
Prince Harry Gets Emotional During Trial: Here's Why -
Queen Camilla Supports Charity's Work On Cancer With Latest Visit -
Dove Cameron Opens Up About Her Latest Gig Alongside Avan Jogia -
Petition Against Blake Lively PGA Letter Gains Traction After Texts With Taylor Swift Revealed -
Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion: All-cash Offer -
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court