PHC re-issues contempt notice to Imran Khan
Statements about pending cases
By Akhtar Amin
November 13, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Thursday re-issued contempt of court notice to the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan, directing him to submit a reply and explain his position for issuing statements about the cases pending before the court.
During hearing of the contempt notice, Advocate General (AG), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Abdul Lateef Yousafzai, informed the bench that Imran Khan had contacted him and requested for another two weeks time for submission of his reply to the contempt of court notice case. The bench comprised of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Justice Muhammad Younas Thaheem.
After the request made by Imran Khan was conveyed to the court, the chief justice asked the Advocate General (AG) whether he could appear in a case for the head of a political party in the court.
The AG replied that he had not appeared in the case for Imran Khan but just informed the court about the request Imran Khan conveyed to him. He said Imran Khan would hire a lawyer for the next hearing into the case.
Counsel for the doctors, Khalid Mehmood stated that the political leaders should avoid issuing statements on the cases pending before the courts.
The chief justice remarked that the court was well aware of its jurisdiction in all matters, but the courts were dealing with some matters carefully.
The bench separated the contempt of court case against the PTI chairman from the other cases in which the doctors have challenged the Medical Teaching Institutions Reforms Act 2015.
On previous hearing, a division bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim had issued contempt of court notice to Imran Khan for using derogatory language and issuing threatening statement against doctors who had challenged the Medical Teaching Institutions Reforms Act 2015 and obtained a stay order. “We are issuing contempt of court notice to PTI Chairman Imran Khan. The PTI chief is directed to submit a reply and explain his position for passing statements about the cases, which are pending before the court,” a division bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim had stated in the order.
During hearing of the contempt notice, Advocate General (AG), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Abdul Lateef Yousafzai, informed the bench that Imran Khan had contacted him and requested for another two weeks time for submission of his reply to the contempt of court notice case. The bench comprised of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Justice Muhammad Younas Thaheem.
After the request made by Imran Khan was conveyed to the court, the chief justice asked the Advocate General (AG) whether he could appear in a case for the head of a political party in the court.
The AG replied that he had not appeared in the case for Imran Khan but just informed the court about the request Imran Khan conveyed to him. He said Imran Khan would hire a lawyer for the next hearing into the case.
Counsel for the doctors, Khalid Mehmood stated that the political leaders should avoid issuing statements on the cases pending before the courts.
The chief justice remarked that the court was well aware of its jurisdiction in all matters, but the courts were dealing with some matters carefully.
The bench separated the contempt of court case against the PTI chairman from the other cases in which the doctors have challenged the Medical Teaching Institutions Reforms Act 2015.
On previous hearing, a division bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim had issued contempt of court notice to Imran Khan for using derogatory language and issuing threatening statement against doctors who had challenged the Medical Teaching Institutions Reforms Act 2015 and obtained a stay order. “We are issuing contempt of court notice to PTI Chairman Imran Khan. The PTI chief is directed to submit a reply and explain his position for passing statements about the cases, which are pending before the court,” a division bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim had stated in the order.
-
Enjoy Lee, Takaichi’s Viral Jamming Session, In Case You Missed It -
MrBeast Admits He's Unsure About Having Kids - Here's Why -
Prince Harry Carries Heartbreaking Hope For Archie, Lilibet Who Are Not Sharing In Their Royal Heritage -
Tom Brady Breaks Silence On 'personal Life' After Alix Earle Rumors -
Guy Fieri Drops Health Update After Accident That Left Him In A Wheelchair -
Experts Weigh In: Is Prince Harry Operating A PR Stunt Or The Invictus Games’ -
Inside Kate Middleton’s Biography With Secrets From St Andrews To Harry & Meghan’s Royal Exit -
Paul Mescal Reveals Shocking Move He Made In 'Hamnet' -
'Kanye West Is Human Too' -
Prince William Hands Kate Middleton Something Highly Sensitive To Manage With Coronation -
Critics Get Honest About 'A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms' -
Why Harry Unlikely To Meet William, Kate During UK Return? -
X To Change AI Chatbot 'Grok' After Outrage Over Explicit Deepfake Images -
Princess Eugenie Set To Hit New Milestone As Andrew's Eviction Looms -
Emilia Clarke Gets Honest About Featuring In Shows Like 'Game Of Thrones' -
Amazon Employees’ Break-time Fight Ends In Murder In Texas