LHC allows Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's application part of reference
LAHORE: A division bench of the Lahore High Court Wednesday allowed a miscellaneous application filed by Jang/Geo Editor-in- Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman to make copy of the NAB reference against him as part of record about his bail petition into 34 years old property case.
Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman had filed the application through his counsel Amjad Pervaiz. The counsel pleaded that NAB had filed the reference against his client and others in the trial court and it would be helpful for him while extending arguments in the bail petition. After hearing arguments, bench comprising Justice Sardar Ahmad Naeem and Justice Farooq Haider accepted the application made copy of reference the part of record pertaining to bail petition of Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman. A two-member bench will take up Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman’s bail petition into 34 years old property case on July 7.
-
Rachel McAdams Becomes Object Of Jokes At Hollywood Star Of Fame Event -
South Korea's Ex-PM Han Duck-soo Jailed For 23 Years Over Martial Law Crises -
Global Markets On Edge Over Greenland Dispute: Is US Economic Leadership At Risk? -
King, Queen Visit Deadly Train Crash Site -
Oxford Research Warns ChatGPT Reflects Western Worldviews -
UK Inflation Unexpectedly Rises To 3.4% In December, The First Increase In Five Months -
Meghan Markle Set To Take Big Decision On Returning To UK For Invictus Games -
Prince Harry To Leave Britain One Day Earlier Than Expected For THIS Reason -
The Way You Consume Sugar Could Be Affecting Your Health -
Brooklyn Beckham Gets Backing From Vanessa Marcil Amid Feud With Parents -
OpenAI Uses AI To Detect Under 18 Users On ChatGPT -
Philippines To Lift Ban On Grok AI After Musk's Platform Commits To Fix Safety Concerns -
Trump Vows ‘no Going Back’ On Greenland Ahead Of Davos Visit -
Alexander Skarsgard Breaks Silence On Rumors He Is Bisexual -
King Charles Faces Rift With Prince William Over Prince Harry’s Invictus Games -
Elon Musk’s Critique On ChatGPT Safety Draws Sharp Response From Sam Altman