Supreme Court restrains PHC from hearing Worker Welfare Board case
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) Wednesday restrained the bench number 1 of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) from hearing the Worker Welfare Board’s plea seeking constitution of a larger bench.
Hearing the case, a two-member bench of the apex court — comprising Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan — held that the PHC could not take up the matter unless the appeals pending with the Supreme Court were decided.
The apex court expressed grave concern over the High Court for ignoring the precedent set by it [Supreme Court] and observed that the high court was bound to give decisions in accordance with the principles of the apex court.
Meanwhile, the court also expressed dissatisfaction with the reply submitted by the PHC registrar in the matter. The chief justice said they had issued a notice to the registrar but he had submitted an unsatisfactory reply.
Justice Ijazul Ahsen observed that prima facie, the bench of Peshawar High Court had ignored the Supreme Court decisions. The judge further observed that under Article 189 of the Constitution, the high court was bound to take into account the recent decisions of the Supreme Court.
Attorney General Khalid Javed informed the court that different appeals against the PHC verdicts were pending with the Supreme Court, hence the Peshawar High Court should be restrained from hearing the Board matter until the apex court decided them.
Khawaja Azhar Rasheed, counsel for the Workers Welfare Board, submitted that the high court was ignoring the Supreme Court decisions. Meanwhile, the court restrained the PHC from hearing the instant matter till the decision on appeals pending with the Supreme Court. The court directed its office to club all the pending appeals of the Worker Welfare Board, KP and fix the matter for hearing.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication