Punjab Irrigation Dept plea time-barred: CJP says what they can do if govt sleeps over its own right
LAHORE: Supreme Court Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmad rebuked the Punjab government for delayed filing of appeals to challenge decisions of the Lahore High Court.
“What can we do if the government does not awake from slumber for its own right?” regretted the chief justice hearing an appeal by Punjab Irrigation Department Friday at the Lahore Registry. Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Ijazul Ahsan joined the chief justice on a three-member bench that found the department’s appeal time-barred.
The chief justice observed that apparently the department intentionally delayed the appeal against the decision of the Lahore High Court whereas the impugned decision was full of illegalities. He ordered an additional advocate general to ensure that the officials responsible for the delay in filing of the appeals were taken to task. Separately, the bench dismissed an appeal by the provincial government against appointment of a woman Secondary School Teacher (SST) of physics. The additional advocate general argued that education policy 2011 required that a SST must be a subject specialist but the respondent woman Shumaila had been appointed as physics teacher despite having not studied the subject in FSc and MSc. However, the bench observed that the advertisement for the post had not mentioned such requirement for FSc whereas the respondent studied physics in BSc. The bench dismissed the appeal. Meanwhile, the bench also dismissed an appeal of a ‘patwari’ terminated on charge of misappropriation in government fee for mutation. The bench observed that the appellant/’patwari’ caused loss to the public exchequer and did not deserve any concession. Sheikh Mubarak through his counsel contended that he was accused of not depositing Rs75,000 of mutation fee in the government treasury. He said the department terminated him without affording an opportunity of hearing. The appellant said he faced no allegation of corruption during his 32-year long career. He asked the court to issue order for his reinstatement. However, the bench dismissed the appeal.
-
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’ -
'Coronation Street' Star Sally Ann Matthews Finally Reveals Why She Quit ITV Soap -
Prince Andrew's Major Sacrifice For Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Royal Titles Revealed -
ICE Agent Misfired Bullet Into Minnesota Hotel’s Guest Room -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Fergie Still Counting On Each Other? Deets -
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama