Musharraf plea referred to LHC CJ for full bench formation
LAHORE: A single judge bench of the Lahore High Court on Tuesday requested the chief justice to constitute a larger bench to decide a petition filed by former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, challenging establishment of the special trial court and all actions against him starting from filing of a high treason complaint.
Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi observed that important legal issues had been raised through the petition, especially with reference to jurisdiction of filing of the complaint and constitution of special court, which required its determination at length.
“Keeping in view the significance of the legal aspects, the case is referred to Honourable Chief Justice for constitution of Full Bench,” the judge said in his order.
Filed through advocates Khwaja Tariq Rahim and Azhar Siddique, the petition argued that the trial court had not been constituted lawfully as mandatory approval from the federal cabinet had not been sought for it. It asked the court to summon summary from the law ministry regarding the constitution of the trial court.
The petition stated that Musharraf was unable to return to Pakistan due to his medical condition while the special court declared him a proclaimed offender on June 19, 2016 and also seized his family property.
The petition asked the high court to set aside all actions against him including establishment of the trial court, filing of the complaint and appointment of prosecution team for being unconstitutional.
APP adds: Additional Attorney General Ishtiaq A Khan and Musharraf’s counsel Muhammad Azhar Siddique and Khwaja Ahmad Tariq Rahim appeared before the court.
The court observed that Pervez Musharraf was a resident of Islamabad and how the LHC could hear the matter.
The court asked the counsel to refer to any judgement of the superior courts in that regard.
Musharraf’s counsel stated that the practice had already been witnessed in the LNG (liquefied natural gas) case.
The court observed that how the matter could be decided if the statement of the accused under 342 had not been recorded.
Pervez Musharraf counsel stated that the special court had sought arguments in writing for Tuesday, besides observing that the decision would also be announced the same day. But, the case could not be decided without fulfilling the legal requirements, he added.
The court adjourned further hearing till Wednesday (today).
-
Prince Harry All Set To Return To Britain Next Week? -
Is Princess Charlotte Becoming Most Confident Young Royal? -
‘Stranger Things’ Star David Harbour Speaks Up About ‘psychotherapy’ -
Jennifer Love Hewitt Talks About Scary 9-1-1 Episode -
Kate Middleton Ditches Palace Life For Where She 'truly Relaxes' -
Pixel Watch May Soon Warn You If You Leave It Behind -
Serious Liver Scarring Shows Potential To Be Reversed With Latest Drug -
Elon Musk Backs Donald Trump To Invoke Insurrection Act Amid Minnesota Protests -
Scientists Unravel Mystery Of James Webb’s ‘little Red Dots’ In Deep Space -
Nano Banana Explained: How Google’s AI Got Its Name -
Fire Causes Power Outage On Tokyo Train Lines, Thousands Stranded As ‘operations Halted’ -
YouTube, BBC To Ink Landmark Deal To Launch Exclusive Bespoke Shows -
Meghan Markle Turning Prince Harry's Invictus Games Event Into 'bad Fashion Show' -
TikTok To Roll Out New Age Detection Technology Across Europe -
Tom Brady Explains How Divorce With Gisele Bündchen Affected His NFL Career -
Taiwan, TSMC To Expand US Investment: A Strategic Move In Global AI Chip Race