Musharraf plea referred to LHC CJ for full bench formation
LAHORE: A single judge bench of the Lahore High Court on Tuesday requested the chief justice to constitute a larger bench to decide a petition filed by former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, challenging establishment of the special trial court and all actions against him starting from filing of a high treason complaint. Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi observed that important legal issues had been raised through the petition, especially with reference to jurisdiction of filing of the complaint and constitution of special court, which required its determination at length.
“Keeping in view the significance of the legal aspects, the case is referred to Honourable Chief Justice for constitution of Full Bench,” the judge said in his order.
Filed through advocates Khwaja Tariq Rahim and Azhar Siddique, the petition argued that the trial court had not been constituted lawfully as mandatory approval from the federal cabinet had not been sought for it. It asked the court to summon summary from the law ministry regarding the constitution of the trial court.
The petition stated that Musharraf was unable to return to Pakistan due to his medical condition while the special court declared him a proclaimed offender on June 19, 2016 and also seized his family property.
The petition asked the high court to set aside all actions against him including establishment of the trial court, filing of the complaint and appointment of prosecution team for being unconstitutional.
APP adds: Additional Attorney General Ishtiaq A Khan and Musharraf’s counsel Muhammad Azhar Siddique and Khwaja Ahmad Tariq Rahim appeared before the court.
The court observed that Pervez Musharraf was a resident of Islamabad and how the LHC could hear the matter.
The court asked the counsel to refer to any judgement of the superior courts in that regard.
Musharraf’s counsel stated that the practice had already been witnessed in the LNG (liquefied natural gas) case.
The court observed that how the matter could be decided if the statement of the accused under 342 had not been recorded.
Pervez Musharraf counsel stated that the special court had sought arguments in writing for Tuesday, besides observing that the decision would also be announced the same day. But, the case could not be decided without fulfilling the legal requirements, he added. The court adjourned further hearing till Wednesday (today).
-
Queen Camilla Tugs At Heartstrings By Talking About Cancer And Not Needing To ‘pretend’ -
North West Skips Traditional School As Kim Kardashian Explains Why -
Prince Harry Claims Media Has ‘no Limits’ In Light Of Diana Death -
Andrew Inches To The Point Of No Return As He Loses What Little He Had Remaining As The King’s Brother -
Inside Meghan Markle’s Recipe Drop After Netflix Decides Against ‘With Love, Meghan’ Season 3 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Pre-nup Details, Secrets And Divorce Settlement Comes To Light -
Royal Camp Is Focused On Fighting Against ‘Harry Distractions:’ Expert -
Andrew’s Gun License Turns Into The Final Straw? ‘To Him There’s Nothing Left Worth Getting Out Of Bed For’ -
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion