High treason case against Mush: LHC seeks govt’s explanation
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday directed the federal government to explain to it as how the case against former president Musharraf falls under the definition of high treason.
The court is hearing a petition of Musharraf challenging the formation of the Special Court conducting his trial on charges of high treason for declaring a state of emergency on November 3, 2007 and holding the Constitution in abeyance.
At the outset of the hearing, Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi asked Musharraf’s lawyer that the Islamabad High Court had “granted desired relief to your client”. The lawyer, however, replied that the instant petition carried different law points to the petition filed by the Ministry of Interior in the IHC. He pointed out that Musharraf had challenged the formation of the Special Court before the LHC while the interior ministry had not raised the same objection before the IHC.
To a court query, the petitioner’s counsel admitted that the IHC had stopped the Special Court from pronouncing judgment and the right to fair trial has also been permitted to his client.
On it, Justice Naqvi ordered the government to file the record of the case by December 3. The Lahore High Court had declared the petition of former president Pervez Musharraf as maintainable on Tuesday while overruling the LHC registrar’s objections. Musharraf in his petition said that the Special Court has reserved judgment in the case on November 19 without hearing his stance. He also questioned formation of the Special Court, saying that the then prime minister alone granted approval for the constitution of the Special Court and the cabinet’s sanction was not sought. A three-judge IHC bench headed by Chief Justice Athar Minallah on Wednesday set aside the November 19 order of the Special Court and instructed it to hear all sides before deciding the case.
-
Queen Camilla Tugs At Heartstrings By Talking About Cancer And Not Needing To ‘pretend’ -
North West Skips Traditional School As Kim Kardashian Explains Why -
Prince Harry Claims Media Has ‘no Limits’ In Light Of Diana Death -
Andrew Inches To The Point Of No Return As He Loses What Little He Had Remaining As The King’s Brother -
Inside Meghan Markle’s Recipe Drop After Netflix Decides Against ‘With Love, Meghan’ Season 3 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Pre-nup Details, Secrets And Divorce Settlement Comes To Light -
Royal Camp Is Focused On Fighting Against ‘Harry Distractions:’ Expert -
Andrew’s Gun License Turns Into The Final Straw? ‘To Him There’s Nothing Left Worth Getting Out Of Bed For’ -
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion