PHC shows anger over police raid on a house sans warrants
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday directed the police officials not to conduct raids without warrant or else action would be taken against them for
harassing the general public.
A division bench of the PHC comprising Justice Qaisar Rashid and Justice Abdul Shakoor was hearing the case of a police raid on a house in the limits of the City Police Station in Charsadda and keeping a woman in the lock-up the whole night.
A Charsadda resident, Tariq, had moved the court against the police raid
and harassment of female members of the family.
The counsel for the petitioner, Shakil Advocate, told the court that the police picked up a young woman of the family after the accused was not found in the house.
He added that the woman was kept in the lock-up for the whole night.
The lawyer told the court that as per police, the woman’s brother, Usman, is wanted to the police in a murder case. He added that he is yet to be charged in the FIR.
The deputy superintendent of police (DSP) and Station House Office (SHO) of the City Police Station, Charsadda, appeared in the court on Tuesday. Justice Qaisar Rashid, while expressing his anger over the incident, asked the officials as to why the police were terrorising families by
conducting raids at midnight.
The judge asked if the house that was raided belonged to terrorists or is there the law of the jungle that police were spreading terror and harassing women through raids without any warrant.
He warned of action against the DSP concerned and SHO if police conducted any raid without warrants in future.
The force was directed to carry out action under the law.
Another bench of the PHC comprising Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim issued notice to the Dispute Resolution Council (DRC), Takht Bhai to appear before the court with the relevant record at the next hearing of the case.
One Mohammad Amin had moved the court against a verdict by the DRC in a dispute over 12 kanal of property in Swabi.
The petitioner pleaded that the verdict of the DRC is unlawful. The court after hearing arguments summoned the DRC members.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication