PHC stops subordinate court from trying defamation suit
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in
By our correspondents
June 27, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in the suit instead of recording evidence.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses.
On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses.
On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
-
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’ -
'Coronation Street' Star Sally Ann Matthews Finally Reveals Why She Quit ITV Soap -
Prince Andrew's Major Sacrifice For Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Royal Titles Revealed -
ICE Agent Misfired Bullet Into Minnesota Hotel’s Guest Room -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Fergie Still Counting On Each Other? Deets -
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama