Continued absence in treason case: What’s being done to bring Musharraf back
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Thursday directed the federal government to submit a report on the measures taken for repatriation of former president General (R) Pervez Musharraf who’d been indicted in a treason case in 2014 by a Special Court.
A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, heard a petition filed by former president of Lahore High Court Bar Association, Rawalpindi bench as well as a contempt petition filed by Advocate Sheikh Ahsen Uddin.
The court directed the Attorney General for Pakistan to appear before it in person and explain and submit a report by March 25 telling as to what measures had been taken so far by the federal government for bringing Musharraf back.
The court also sought a report from the Special Court registrar explaining reasons for delaying proceedings in the high treason case.
Petitioner Sheikh Ahsen Uddin told the court that under Article 5 of the Constitution loyalty to the state as well as to the Constitution was the basic duty of every citizen of Pakistan.
He said although a special court had been constituted for trying Musharraf for high treason but the new government halted its proceedings.
Similarly, he requested the court to inquire from the government as to what steps it had taken so far for bringing Musharraf back, as the special court had repeatedly issued his production orders but he was yet to be brought back.
Taufeeq Asif also pleaded that the proceedings of the Special Court had been halted and there had been no progress so far on Musharraf’s repatriation.
Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan observed that it was said the court had allowed Musharraf to go abroad but the fact was that the government and not the court allowed him to go abroad.
Justice Khosa said the court had left it to the government but did not mention in its order that Musharraf be sent abroad.
“If the accused does not come back then his statement can be recorded through a video link. If he does not record his statement via video link, then it will be understood that he has denied the charges,” said the chief justice.
“The Special Court can write ‘denied’ in front of all his statements,” the CJP remarked and asked if the court became helpless if a suspect refused to appear before it.
The chief justice said everyone was equal before the law and issued notices to the federal government and all respondents in the instant matter.
Later, the court adjourned the herring. It is pertinent to mention that the Special Court had indicted Musharraf in high treason case on March 30, 2014 for imposing emergency rule on November 3, 2007
The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had filed a treason case against him.
A three-member special court on May 11, 2016 declared Musharraf an absconder for failing to appear before the court despite issuing multiple summons. Later, the court declared him a proclaimed offender and ordered seizure of his property.
-
Queen Camilla Tugs At Heartstrings By Talking About Cancer And Not Needing To ‘pretend’ -
North West Skips Traditional School As Kim Kardashian Explains Why -
Prince Harry Claims Media Has ‘no Limits’ In Light Of Diana Death -
Andrew Inches To The Point Of No Return As He Loses What Little He Had Remaining As The King’s Brother -
Inside Meghan Markle’s Recipe Drop After Netflix Decides Against ‘With Love, Meghan’ Season 3 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Pre-nup Details, Secrets And Divorce Settlement Comes To Light -
Royal Camp Is Focused On Fighting Against ‘Harry Distractions:’ Expert -
Andrew’s Gun License Turns Into The Final Straw? ‘To Him There’s Nothing Left Worth Getting Out Of Bed For’ -
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion