PHC stays construction on disputed property in Bara
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stayed construction on a disputed property till the restoration of the judicial system in the tribal districts.
A single bench of Justice Shakil Ahmad issued the stay order in a writ petition filed by a tribesman, seeking an order of the court to stop his rival from construction on his land.
Qasim Jan, a resident of Bara in Khyber district, filed the writ petition against the assistant commissioner, Bara and rivals, including Muhammad Noor and Shamsuddin.
The petitioner claimed that due to the non-existence of the judicial system after the repeal of the Frontier Crimes Regulation and subsequent Fata Interim Governance Regulation, the rivals have started construction on the disputed land. Shakirullah Afridi, counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner filed a complaint with the assistant commissioner, stating that he had a land dispute with Muhammad Noor and Shamsuddin.
He contended without settlement of the dispute, the rivals have started construction over the land.
The lawyer stated that the assistant commissioner had issued a notice to the rivals and recorded statements of both the parties. However, the lawyer argued that in the meantime, the federal government had introduced 25th Amendment in the Constitution by amending Article 247 (7).
In order to run the affairs in the tribal districts, the federal government then introduced Fata Interim Governance Regulation 2018, but the same was turned down by the Peshawar High Court on October 30.
The lawyer submitted that presently no law exists in the tribal districts after the high court’s decision to declare the Interim Governance Regulation ultra vires of the Constitution.
Taking advantage of the current situation, he said, the respondents have started construction over the disputed land.
He said when the petitioner approached the assistant commissioner against the unlawful act, he did not take any action, with the observation that he has no judicial powers to intervene into the matter.
The court stayed the construction and issued a notice to assistant commissioner and respondents to submit reply before the next hearing.
-
Bruno Mars Leaves Taylor Swift Behind With Shocking Move -
Trump Administration Imposes 25% Tariff On Imports Of Some AI Chips -
Chinese Smartphone Makers Adjust Prices As Costs Go Up -
Wikipedia Owner Signs AI Content Training Deals With Microsoft, Meta -
Meghan Markle’s Real Feelings Revealed Amid UK Return Rumours -
Reese Witherspoon Issues Urgent Warning After Scammers Using Her Identity -
XAI Restricts Grok Image Editing After Backlash From California And Europe -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew’s Past Scandals Catch Up To His Daughters -
Amazon Rolls Out ‘sovereign’ EU-based Cloud To Address Data Privacy Concerns -
Ross, Matt Duffer Used AI To Write Finale Of 'Stranger Things'? -
Microsoft Secures Largest Ever Soil Carbon Credit Agreement Amid Data Centres Expansion -
Google Expands Gemini With Personal Intelligence -
Japan, Philippines Sign Defence Pacts As Regional Tensions Escalate -
ISS Crew Of Four Completes Medical Evacuation With Safe Splashdown Off California -
Connor Storrie Reveals Why His Dad Hasn't Seen 'Heated Rivalry' Yet -
Meghan Markle’s Biggest Challenge In UK Return As She Struggles To Control Narrative