PHC moved to get PTI MNA Murad Saeed disqualified
PESHAWAR: A voter from the constituency of Member National Assembly (MNA) Murad Saeed on Wednesday filed a petition with the Peshawar High Court seeking his disqualification. The voter, Haider Ali Shah, from Swat filed the writ petition through his lawyer Syed Haziq Ali Shah to seek the disqualification of Murad
By our correspondents
April 29, 2015
PESHAWAR: A voter from the constituency of Member National Assembly (MNA) Murad Saeed on Wednesday filed a petition with the Peshawar High Court seeking his disqualification.
The voter, Haider Ali Shah, from Swat filed the writ petition through his lawyer Syed Haziq Ali Shah to seek the disqualification of Murad Saeed as MNA. It was submitted in the petition that under Section 12 (2) of the Representation of People Act 1976, every nomination paper shall accompany a declaration that the candidate fulfills the qualification specified in Article 62 of the Constitution.
It further clarified that the candidate, his spouse or any of his dependent has not defaulted on payment of government dues or utility charges at the time of filing papers.
The petitioner stated that Murad Saeed had defaulted on his hostel dues, which were Rs19,680 during 2007-2009. The petitioner further clarified that the PTI MNA misstated at the time of submitting nomination papers that he had obtained the BS Environmental Sciences degree.
“Murad Saeed was absent in two papers, Introduction to Environmental Sciences and Remote Sensing and Ecology,” the petition claimed. It added that as per the UoP examination rules a student, who fails to complete course and could not clear papers in three years, has to retake the exam. Therefore, Murad Saeed cannot legally appear in these papers after the lapse of three years.
It said that the PTI MNA gave false declaration under Section 12 of the RPA, 1976 and exposed himself to disqualification as envisage under Section 99 of the RPA 1976. The court was requested to declare the notification of Murad Saeed as elected representative of NA-29 as void and of no legal effect. The petitioner further prayed to declare Murad Saeed as dishonest and therefore disqualified to hold the public office of MNA.
As interim relief, the petitioner requested to suspend the operation of notification of successful candidature of Murad Saeed and holding the membership of parliament till the final decision of the case. The court, after preliminary hearing, clubbed the writ petition with the PTI MNA’s petition seeking his BS degree from UoP, which would be heard on April 30.
The voter, Haider Ali Shah, from Swat filed the writ petition through his lawyer Syed Haziq Ali Shah to seek the disqualification of Murad Saeed as MNA. It was submitted in the petition that under Section 12 (2) of the Representation of People Act 1976, every nomination paper shall accompany a declaration that the candidate fulfills the qualification specified in Article 62 of the Constitution.
It further clarified that the candidate, his spouse or any of his dependent has not defaulted on payment of government dues or utility charges at the time of filing papers.
The petitioner stated that Murad Saeed had defaulted on his hostel dues, which were Rs19,680 during 2007-2009. The petitioner further clarified that the PTI MNA misstated at the time of submitting nomination papers that he had obtained the BS Environmental Sciences degree.
“Murad Saeed was absent in two papers, Introduction to Environmental Sciences and Remote Sensing and Ecology,” the petition claimed. It added that as per the UoP examination rules a student, who fails to complete course and could not clear papers in three years, has to retake the exam. Therefore, Murad Saeed cannot legally appear in these papers after the lapse of three years.
It said that the PTI MNA gave false declaration under Section 12 of the RPA, 1976 and exposed himself to disqualification as envisage under Section 99 of the RPA 1976. The court was requested to declare the notification of Murad Saeed as elected representative of NA-29 as void and of no legal effect. The petitioner further prayed to declare Murad Saeed as dishonest and therefore disqualified to hold the public office of MNA.
As interim relief, the petitioner requested to suspend the operation of notification of successful candidature of Murad Saeed and holding the membership of parliament till the final decision of the case. The court, after preliminary hearing, clubbed the writ petition with the PTI MNA’s petition seeking his BS degree from UoP, which would be heard on April 30.
-
Inside Channing Tatum's Red Carpet Return After Shoulder Surgery -
Ryan Coogler Brands 'When Harry Met Sally' His Most Favourite Rom Com While Discussing Love For Verstality -
Sarah Pidgeon Explains Key To Portraying Carolyn Bessette Kennedy -
Justin Bieber Rocked The World With Bold Move 15 Years Ago -
Sam Levinson Wins Hearts With Huge Donation To Eric Dane GoFundMe -
Kate Middleton Steps Out First Time Since Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Arrest -
Inside Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi's 'private' Marriage With Husband Jionni LaValle Amid Health Scare -
Germany’s Ruling Coalition Backs Social Media Ban For Children Under 14 -
Meghan Markle Shuts Down Harry’s Hopes Of Reconnecting With ‘disgraced’ Uncle -
Liza Minnelli Alleges She Was Ordered To Use Wheelchair At 2022 Academy Awards -
Quinton Aaron Reveals Why He Does Not Want To Speak To Wife Margarita Ever Again -
Prince William And Kate's Photos With Andrew Used In New Campaign Against Royals -
Touching Eric Dane Moment With Daughter Emerges After Viral Final Words -
Kate Middleton Quietly Backs Princess Beatrice, Eugenie As Andrew Scandal Intensifies -
Michael B. Jordan Shares His Thoughts On Growing Trend Of Live-action Anime Adaptations -
Why Mikaela Shiffrin Celebrated Olympic Gold With Taylor Swift Song?