PHC issues notice to EC over change of constituency number
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday put on notice the Election Commission of Pakistan to submit a reply in a writ petition challenging the number of a constituency from NA-1, Peshawar, to NA-31.
A division bench comprising Justice Syed Muhammad Attique Shah and Justice Syed Arshad Ali issued a notice in the writ petition filed by the senior leader of Awami National Party Ghulam Ahmad Bilour. He has sought an order of the court to retain the old number of his constituency as NA-1.
The petition was filed through Sangeen Khan advocate. The court fixed June 12 as next date of hearing.
During the hearing, the lawyer submitted that though the rule 10 of the elections rules, 2017, provides that the limitation of the constituencies shall start from the northern end of the district. But the ECP, he said, has ‘wrongly’ extended this principle to the numerical order of the constituencies, which is ‘unwarranted’ and beyond the scope of rules and thus ‘illegal’ and ‘unlawful.’
The ECP has started the numbering of constituencies from the northern part of the country and granted NA-1 to Chitral district while the former NA 1, (Peshawar-III), was renumbered as NA-31 (Peshawar-V).
Bilour in his petition said that Peshawar is a historical city and his family and the residents of the city have a historical affiliation with the constituency of NA-1. “They’ve been taking pride to have been the first constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan,” he added.
He stated that the political and historical significance of the constituency evolved through decades of the electoral process and election in the country.
Late Benazir Bhutto and other heads of the party and former chief ministers have contested election from the same NA-1. In all previous delimitations, the constituency was named as NA-1 in numerical order of the constituencies of the National Assembly.
“The unnecessary and unwarranted change of number will only erase electoral history associated with this constituency,” he added.
The lawyer said the former numerical order was disbursed without any solid reason.
“The delimitation doesn’t necessitate the alteration of the number of a constituency. The change in the numerical order of the constituency is bereft of any rational jurisdiction,” he told the bench.
He added that it is settled law that every judicial and administrative authority is obliged to furnish proper reasons before making any such change, but alteration is devoid of any reasonable reason and justification.
Because the ECP has failed to cite any proper administration or technical justification in changing the numbers of the constituencies, the constituency number should be allocated back to NA-31 (Peshawar-V).
-
Prince William Makes Clear The Conditions He Has For Meeting Prince Harry -
Sara Foster Slams Age Gap Relationship After 'blah' George Clooney Date -
Jennifer Garner Recalls Enduring Ben Affleck’s Intense Beyoncé ‘Halo’ Phase -
Prince Harry’s Mental Health Ends Up At Stake As Meghan Moves Him To 'second Fiddle' -
Bradley Cooper On Who His Mother Thinks Is The World’s Best Actor -
Meghan Markle Offers Glimpse Into Intimate Dance Moment With Harry Amid Split Rumors -
Jon Bon Jovi Joins The Viral 2016 Throwback Trend With Nostalgic Photos -
Kate Middleton Hailed For Her Lack Of ‘obligation’ As Well As Altruistic, Selfless Qualities -
Jason Momoa Says Being With Beau Adria Arjona Feels 'perfect' -
Idris Elba Says One Mix-up Nearly Cost Him A Knighthood From King Charles -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Incurs Anger Of Biggest Royal -
Megan Fox, Machine Gun Kelly's Relationship 'is Just About Co-parenting' -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Warned They Can’t Fool Brits Because It Won’t Land -
South Korea’s Ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol, Sentenced To 5 Years In Prison: Key Details Explained -
Princess Beatrice Is ‘terrified’ Of Mom Fergie: ‘She’s Begging Her To Not Destroy Her Future’ -
Harry Styles’ New Album Earns Subtle Nod From Zoe Kravitz’s Dad