PHC asks AG if FIA has jurisdiction over Fata
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the
By Akhtar Amin
March 31, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
-
OpenAI Launches ChatGPT Translate To Rival Google Translate -
Top AI Themes Poised To Shape 2026: Here’s How -
Meghan Markle Accused Of Stealing 'bookmark' Idea -
Leonardo DiCaprio Changes His Stance On THIS To Remain 'his Handsome Self' -
Girl Dies After Years Of Alleged Starvation By Mother In West Virginia -
Here’s How Many Under-16 Social Media Accounts Were Removed In Australia -
Drew Barrymore Gets Candid About The Words That Haunted Her Childhood -
Why Fans Fell For Scammers Impersonating Reese Witherspoon -
'Stranger Things' Star David Harbour Opens Up About Manic Episodes -
Elon Musk Predicts That Solar Power Can Supply The Global Demand For All Of Humanity’s Energy -
Keith Urban Takes Extreme Measures To Not 'air Dirty Laundry' Post-Nicole Kidman Divorce -
Louis Tomlinson Reveals Hidden Anxiety -
Defying Age At Milano Cortina Games: Canadian Skater Stellato-Dudeke Aims For Gold At 42 -
Study Finds Screen Time Does Not Harm Teenagers’ Mental Health -
'Dunesday': What Robert Downey Jr. And Timothee Chalamet Really Think -
UK Regulator Reaffirms Ongoing Investigation Into X Deepfake Probe