PHC asks AG if FIA has jurisdiction over Fata
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the
By Akhtar Amin
March 31, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
-
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Angry As King Charles Ends Their Financial Security -
Chase Infiniti Shares Her Working Experience With Leonardo DiCaprio -
Todd Bridges And Wife Bettijo B. Hirschi Separate After Three Years Of Marriage -
Germany Sends Troops To Greenland Amid Rising Arctic Tensions -
Jonathan Quick, The New York Rangers Face Mounting Pressure As Losses Pile Up -
Timothée Chalamet, Kylie Jenner Are Living Together In LA: Source -
Johnny Knoxville Net Worth: How The Actor Built A $50mn Fortune -
Meghan Markle Hidden Agenda Behind Returning To UK Exposed -
Raptors Vs Pacers: Toronto Shorthanded With Key Players Ruled Out Due To Injuries -
Iran Flight Radar Update: Airspace Closure Extended Amid Heightened Tensions -
Toronto Snow Day: What To Expect After Environment Canada's Snow Storm Warning -
Céline Dion Honours Late Husband René Angélil On 10th Anniversary Of His Death -
Astrologer Gives Their Verdict On ‘Rat’ Prince Harry’s New Year -
Meghan Markle Seeks 'special Treatment' Ahead Of Possible UK Return: Report -
EBay Launches First Climate Transition Plan, Targets 'zero Emissions' By 2045 -
Rihanna To Announce Music Comeback And UK Stadium Shows