PHC asks if case record can be given to convicts’ counsels
Extends stay order on suspension of death sentences to three militants
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday asked the law officers and lawyers for those convicted on terror charges by the military courts to assist the court at the next hearing whether the record of the cases could be handed over to the convicts’ counsels for inspection.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Roohul Amin Khan Chamkani and Justice Muhammad Daud Khan sought assistance on this law point after counsels for the convicted militants asked why the record of the cases wasn’t being provided to them.
“The non-availability of the record to the lawyers of the convicts is against Article 10-A of Constitution about fair trial,” argued Ghulam Mohiuddin Malik, counsel for Muhammad Tayyab who was awarded death sentence by a military court on terrorism charges.
The deputy attorney general, who appeared in the cases, opposed the request by the lawyers for providing the case record to the lawyers. He said these were secret and sensitive documents that could be provided to the judges for inspection in appeals against convictions.
The bench asked the lawyers to go through the detailed judgment of Supreme Court about the military courts and inform the court if there is any direction regarding provision of the case records to counsels for the convicts.
The court rejected the request by the deputy attorney general to declare the proceedings of the cases as in-camera. “How can we declare the proceedings of an open court as in-camera?” Justice Roohul Amin Khan observed. The court extended the stay order on suspension of death sentence to the three militants till the next hearing of these cases and until court’s decision whether the record of the cases would be provided to the lawyers of the convicts.
At the previous hearing, a division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth had suspended the death sentences awarded to Muhammad Tayyab, Muhammad Ayaz and Azizur Rehman. Their fathers had filed review petitions against the military courts’ verdict.
-
NASA Celebrates One Year Of Trump’s Second Term With Moon And Mars Achievements -
Chris Pratt Shares Real Thoughts On AI In Film Industry -
Netflix Disappointed As Meghan Markle’s Series Struggles To Impress -
Royal Family Announces Death Of Princess: King Releases Statement -
Sarah Ferguson Will Continue To Be Part Of Andrew's Life -
Google’s Gemini Now Offers Free SAT Prep With Full-length Mock Tests -
Everything You Need To Know About Macron’s Viral Glasses: Cost, Model, All Details Revealed -
Elon Musk Warns Of AI ‘supersonic Tsunami’: What It Means For Future -
Why Victoria Beckham's Dance Video From Brooklyn's Wedding Won't Be Released -
Prince Harry No Longer Focused On Healing Royal Family Feud? -
OpenAI Aims To Make AI A Daily Global Tool -
Will Andrew Receive Any Royal Treatment After Title, Royal Lodge Removal? -
How Your Body 'suffers' In Back Pain And Simple Way To Fix It -
What Victoria Beckham Really Did At Brooklyn, Nicola’s Wedding Revealed -
Send Your Name To Moon With Nasa’s Artemis Mission: Here’s How -
Zhipu AI, MiniMax Debuts Mask Structural Hurdles For China’s Tech Giants