Musharraf warned of non-bailable arrest warrants
Non-appearance before court
By our correspondents
February 21, 2015
ISLAMABAD: The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Judge, Islamabad, Sohail Ikram, during the course of hearing into the judges detention case against Pervez Musharraf remarked that the attitude of former president for appearing in the court was not right and observed as to why the court should not issue his non-bailable arrest warrants.
The ATC judge, Islamabad, took up for hearing the judges detention case against former president Pervez Musharraf on Friday.Ilyas Siddqui, counsel for Pervez Musharraf, could not appear in the court and his junior lawyer Rana Jamil and public before the court. Counsel for Pervez Musharraf told the court that senior lawyer Ilyas Siddiqui who was to complete his arguments on the petition seeking permanent exemption for Pervez Musharraf from attendance in the court was engaged in a case in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he requested the court to adjourn the hearing of the case.
The judge while expressing resentment remarked that judges’ detention case had been pending in the court for one and a half years and counsel for the former president was not completing his arguments nor the petition seeking permanent exemption for former president was being debated.The court while accepting plea for exemption of one day from court attendance in respect of Pervez Musharraf adjourned the hearing of the case till February, 27.
The ATC judge, Islamabad, took up for hearing the judges detention case against former president Pervez Musharraf on Friday.Ilyas Siddqui, counsel for Pervez Musharraf, could not appear in the court and his junior lawyer Rana Jamil and public before the court. Counsel for Pervez Musharraf told the court that senior lawyer Ilyas Siddiqui who was to complete his arguments on the petition seeking permanent exemption for Pervez Musharraf from attendance in the court was engaged in a case in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he requested the court to adjourn the hearing of the case.
The judge while expressing resentment remarked that judges’ detention case had been pending in the court for one and a half years and counsel for the former president was not completing his arguments nor the petition seeking permanent exemption for former president was being debated.The court while accepting plea for exemption of one day from court attendance in respect of Pervez Musharraf adjourned the hearing of the case till February, 27.
-
Charli XCX Reveals ‘confusing’ Toll ‘Brat’ Popularity Took On Her -
Android Phones At Risk: PromptSpy Malware Exploits AI -
Barry Manilow Gives Insight Into 'very Depressing' Doctor Visit As He Postpones 2026 Arena Tour Due To Cancer -
Margot Robbie Opens Up About Imposter Syndrome ‘crisis’ -
'Desperate' Sarah Ferguson Won't Go Down Without A Fight -
Prince William, Kate Face Major Challenge To Repair Monarchy Reputation After Andrew Arrest -
Hidden ‘dark Galaxy' Traced By Ancient Star Clusters Could Rewrite The Cosmic Galaxy Count -
Eric Dane 'really Wanted To Talk About His Daughters' In His Final Netflix Interview Before Death -
AI Superintelligence Race: Meta And Microsoft Back Rival Visions—Who Will Win? -
Chatbots Push Users Into ‘delusional Spirals,’ Experts Warn -
Economist Slams AI Doom Predictions, ‘replacing Humans Is Not Innovation’ -
KATSEYE's Manon Bannerman Takes Break From Group For Personal Reasons -
Prince Harry's Reaction On 'disgraced' Uncle Andrew Arrest Revealed -
Eric Dane’s Friends Initiate GoFundMe To 'support' His Two Daughters After His Death At 53 -
Internet Erupts After Candace Owens Claims Elon Musk And Sam Altman Are ‘not Human’ -
Will Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Stay In Contact With Andrew? Source Speaks Out