SJC moved against CJP, 7 other judges for ‘misconduct’
A complaint of misconduct was filed with Supreme Judicial Council against CJP and seven other judges seeking their removal from the offices
ISLAMABAD: A complaint of misconduct was Friday filed with the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) against the chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) and seven other apex court judges seeking their removal from the offices.
Mian Dawood advocate filed the complaint against Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umer Ata Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsen, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Sayyed Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Mrs Ayesha A Malik, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi and Justice Shahid Waheed under Article 209 of the Constitution.
He submitted that the nominated judges had consistently acted in violation of Article 209 of the Constitution and the Code of Conduct to be observed by the Supreme Court judges.
He submitted that in the recent proceedings in the Supreme Court and the conduct of eight judges, including the chief justice of Pakistan, had proved that they were publically involved in controversies surrounding their judicial conduct, which was a violation of the Code of Conduct and the Constitution.
The petitioner said that the chief justice because of his political, personal agenda and self-interest had blatantly violated Articles 111, 1V, V and VI and 1X of the Code of Conduct and was guilty of misconduct.
He further said Justice Ijazul Ahsen, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Ayesha A Malik and Justice Shahid Waheed were also guilty of misconduct adding that the other three judges Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Sayyed Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi were also guilty of misconduct for passing an illegal, unconstitutional and anticipatory order.
They all were elevated out of turn in violation of seniority principles, he submitted.
-
Queen Camilla Tugs At Heartstrings By Talking About Cancer And Not Needing To ‘pretend’ -
North West Skips Traditional School As Kim Kardashian Explains Why -
Prince Harry Claims Media Has ‘no Limits’ In Light Of Diana Death -
Andrew Inches To The Point Of No Return As He Loses What Little He Had Remaining As The King’s Brother -
Inside Meghan Markle’s Recipe Drop After Netflix Decides Against ‘With Love, Meghan’ Season 3 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Pre-nup Details, Secrets And Divorce Settlement Comes To Light -
Royal Camp Is Focused On Fighting Against ‘Harry Distractions:’ Expert -
Andrew’s Gun License Turns Into The Final Straw? ‘To Him There’s Nothing Left Worth Getting Out Of Bed For’ -
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion