SHC moved against mini-budget, increase in fuel prices
A petition has been filed in the Sindh High Court (SHC) against the increase of fuel prices as well as the mini-budget presented in the National Assembly.
Moulvi Iqbal Haider claimed in the petition that the federal government had illegally presented the mini-budget in the NA on February 15, increasing the general sales tax from 17 per cent to 18 per cent, besides imposing further tax on luxury items and increasing the prices of petroleum products.
He also claimed that presenting the mini-budget at the end of the financial year was not only a deviation from the constitution but also in violation of the law because Pakistan’s residents would directly or indirectly be affected from the unlawful act.
He said the Centre had presented the mini-budget on the instructions of the International Monetary Fund for implementing its policies, adding that it showed that the federal government had failed to run the state’s affairs in accordance with the provisions of the country’s constitution.
He also said the Centre was competent to impose a financial emergency in terms of the constitution’s Article 235, under which the state could be secured from any default. But the federal government is not willing to sacrifice their expenses and lavish lifestyle, he added.
Haider said policies must be formulated with the intention to strengthen the state and its citizens, adding that policies should always be formulated for the betterment and welfare of the citizens who are facing extra burden.
He said that it is the government’s duty to provide all the necessities to the citizens, but the present government has completely failed to control their expenditures and expenses.
And they are imposing taxes on the country’s people that are to be imposed annually, but presenting the mini-budget is a clear deviation of articles 5, 8, 9, 18, 70, 77 and 80, read with Article 25, of the constitution, he added.
He requested that the court declare the mini-budget as well as the increase in the prices of petroleum products a gross violation of articles 5, 8, 9, 18, 70, 77 and 80, read with Article 25, of the constitution.
He sought further direction to the government to withdraw the mini-budget, including the price hike by the federal finance minister, and restrain them from implementing the same.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication