LHC ‘upholds’ NA speaker’s decision on resignations of PTI parliamentarians
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) upheld the decision made by National Assembly Speaker Raja Pervaiz Ashraf regarding the resignations tendered by lawmakers of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), according to a statement issued by the speaker’s office on Friday.
The NA speaker on January 24 accepted the resignations of 43 MNAs of the PTI, a day after the PTI announced the decision to withdraw the resignations. On February 3, the lawmakers moved the LHC, requesting it to set aside the Election Commission of Pakistan’s notifications removing them from their NA seats.
A copy of the LHC’s verdict has been received by the speaker’s office, claimed an official, adding that the court refused to suspend the ECP’s notification and barred the authorities from conducting by-polls in the constituencies until completion of the proceedings of the case. “No interim relief can be granted against the decision of the speaker,” the speaker’s office said quoting the verdict. A copy of the speaker’s January 22 notification has not been enclosed with the application, it added.
The LHC’s verdict proved Ashraf’s stance on the resignations as “correct”, read the statement issued by the speaker’s office. All the matters were decided by looking at the constitutional and legal aspects, it added.
Although, the NA speaker invited the PTI’s lawmakers to appear before him repeatedly but the MNAs turned a deaf ear to the calls and raised objections when he accepted their resignations, which was unconstitutional.
In the petition, Muhammad Riaz Khan Fatyana and 42 other lawmakers said that their resignations were subject to the acceptance of all the 123 PTI MNAs, who had resigned en masse from the lower house of Parliament on April 11 last year — two days after party Chairman Imran Khan was ousted as the prime minister.
The petitioners have sought directions to quarters concerned to declare that they had withdrawn their resignations by conduct, words, and in writing in accordance with the law prior to any acceptance. They pleaded that the Speaker cannot direct issuance of any notification after the withdrawal of their resignations.
The notifications issued by the NA speaker and the ECP are “illegal and unlawful” and the court is requested to set them aside, the petitioners contend. The court was also requested that the notifications remain suspended until the final decision of this petition is announced.
-
Inside Channing Tatum's Red Carpet Return After Shoulder Surgery -
Ryan Coogler Brands 'When Harry Met Sally' His Most Favourite Rom Com While Discussing Love For Verstality -
Sarah Pidgeon Explains Key To Portraying Carolyn Bessette Kennedy -
Justin Bieber Rocked The World With Bold Move 15 Years Ago -
Sam Levinson Wins Hearts With Huge Donation To Eric Dane GoFundMe -
Kate Middleton Steps Out First Time Since Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Arrest -
Inside Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi's 'private' Marriage With Husband Jionni LaValle Amid Health Scare -
Germany’s Ruling Coalition Backs Social Media Ban For Children Under 14 -
Meghan Markle Shuts Down Harry’s Hopes Of Reconnecting With ‘disgraced’ Uncle -
Liza Minnelli Alleges She Was Ordered To Use Wheelchair At 2022 Academy Awards -
Quinton Aaron Reveals Why He Does Not Want To Speak To Wife Margarita Ever Again -
Prince William And Kate's Photos With Andrew Used In New Campaign Against Royals -
Touching Eric Dane Moment With Daughter Emerges After Viral Final Words -
Kate Middleton Quietly Backs Princess Beatrice, Eugenie As Andrew Scandal Intensifies -
Michael B. Jordan Shares His Thoughts On Growing Trend Of Live-action Anime Adaptations -
Why Mikaela Shiffrin Celebrated Olympic Gold With Taylor Swift Song?