SC judge recuses himself from Imran case
ISLAMABAD: A judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan on Tuesday recused himself from hearing identical appeals against the objections of Registrar’s Office to the petitions seeking formation of a high-powered commission to probe the alleged foreign conspiracy to topple the government of former prime minister Imran Khan.
Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, while hearing the appeals in his chamber, recused himself from hearing the appeals and forwarded them to Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umer Ata Bandial for fixing them before another judge of the apex court.
Advocates Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta, Naeemul Hassan and Tariq Badar had filed the petitions in the apex court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, making the Federation of Pakistan through the secretary law and justice, the prime minister and cabinet secretary as respondents. They had prayed for constituting a high-powered commission to investigate the toppling of Imran’s government. The Registrar’s Office had returned the petitions with objections that the pleas had not pointed out as to what questions of public importance in the instant case were involved with reference to enforcement of any of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, so as to directly invoke the SC jurisdiction under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.
It was further objected that the ingredients for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution had not been satisfied. It was objected that the petitioners had not approached any other appropriate forum available under the law for the same relief and provided any justification for not doing so.
On Tuesday, Bhutta submitted that the case was related to safety of foreigners in Pakistan, especially embassies. He said it was required to depute one military and one civilian official to investigate the case.
Similarly, advocate GM Chaudhry submitted that the apex court was competent to hear the matter on the basis of national interest. Likewise, an associate of Azhar Siddique, counsel for petitioner Naeemul Hassan, appeared in the chamber and sought an adjournment.
-
NASA Celebrates One Year Of Trump’s Second Term With Moon And Mars Achievements -
Chris Pratt Shares Real Thoughts On AI In Film Industry -
Netflix Disappointed As Meghan Markle’s Series Struggles To Impress -
Royal Family Announces Death Of Princess: King Releases Statement -
Sarah Ferguson Will Continue To Be Part Of Andrew's Life -
Google’s Gemini Now Offers Free SAT Prep With Full-length Mock Tests -
Everything You Need To Know About Macron’s Viral Glasses: Cost, Model, All Details Revealed -
Elon Musk Warns Of AI ‘supersonic Tsunami’: What It Means For Future -
Why Victoria Beckham's Dance Video From Brooklyn's Wedding Won't Be Released -
Prince Harry No Longer Focused On Healing Royal Family Feud? -
OpenAI Aims To Make AI A Daily Global Tool -
Will Andrew Receive Any Royal Treatment After Title, Royal Lodge Removal? -
How Your Body 'suffers' In Back Pain And Simple Way To Fix It -
What Victoria Beckham Really Did At Brooklyn, Nicola’s Wedding Revealed -
Send Your Name To Moon With Nasa’s Artemis Mission: Here’s How -
Zhipu AI, MiniMax Debuts Mask Structural Hurdles For China’s Tech Giants