Daska by-polls: ECP action against Sialkot district officials declared void
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday said the Election Commission of Pakistan has no jurisdiction to initiate proceedings against district officials.
Setting aside the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the ECP against the then district administration officials and others over alleged irregularities in the Daska by-election in NA-75, the court declared action against the district police officer, deputy commissioner, assistant commissioner and others as invalid. The court held that the petitioners are no longer election officials, hence the ECP has no jurisdiction to initiate proceedings against them. The by-election in the Sialkot constituency gained national importance after the ECP declared February 19, 2021, polls void due to multiple incidents of violence and serious irregularities. Later, the electoral body initiated proceedings against officials involved in the Daska by-poll fiasco. The action was launched after an inquiry report revealed that the NA-75 Sialkot-IV by-election held in Daska was not conducted in a fair, accessible and transparent manner.
However, the officials, including the former Sialkot deputy commissioner, and others challenged the ECP’s action in the high court, which reserved the verdict on the pleas on November 25.
The petitioners’ counsel implored the court that upon annulment of the election in the constituency by the electoral body, their clients are no more election officials, as defined under Section 2(xviii) of the Act, 2017, and the commission against them could conduct no proceedings.
They contended that the commission had no jurisdiction to initiate the impugned disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners, who were no longer under its control. It was argued that the prime duty of the ECP is to administer oath.
If a person is deployed for election duty without adhering to the said statutory provision, he does not fall within the definition of an election official. Thus, the commission cannot take disciplinary action against such persons.
The court, after hearing the petitioners, reserved its verdict and later declared the ECP’s proceedings void.
-
First Poll Since King Charles' Action Against Andrew Reveals Royal Family's Public Standing -
Blake Lively Strengthens Legal Team Ahead Of Justin Baldoni Trial -
'Back To School!': Palace Shares Details Of Princess Anne's Latest Engagements -
Paul Mescal Clarifies Acting Break Comment As He Teases Paul McCartney Role -
Kate Middleton's Unexpected Style Of Arrival At Solo Outing Goes Viral -
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine -
Ben Affleck Argues In Favour Of His Shirtless Scene In 'The Rip' -
Mississippi Postal Worker Arrested After Complaints Of Marijuana Odour In Letters -
Canada, China Lock Initial Trade Deal On ‘EV,Canola’ To Strengthen Ties: What To Expect Next? -
Melissa Leo On Euphoria Of Winning An Oscar Vs It's Impact On Career -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Express 'hope' In Latest Major Statement