Petition against long march: LHC seeks interior ministry, others’ replies
The LHC directed the interior ministry, inspector general of police Punjab and other respondents to file their replies by Nov 21 to a petition filed against the PTI’s long march and protests
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) Monday directed the interior ministry, inspector general of police Punjab and other respondents to file their replies by Nov 21 to a petition filed against the PTI’s long march and protests and also issued a notice to advocate general Punjab for assistance in the matter.
A single bench — comprising Justice Jawad Hassan — heard the petition filed by the traders’ leader Muhammad Naeem Mir. The petitioner’s counsel argued before the court that the people were facing difficulty due to the protests. However, Advocate General Punjab Ahmad Owais argued that it was a preliminary hearing and the court had to issue formal notices to the parties concerned before hearing them.
The additional attorney general submitted that the federal government had written to the Punjab government for controlling the law and order situation in the province, adding that the provinces were bound to comply with directions of the federal government.
He submitted that it was a matter of public interest. He submitted that the motorway and GT Road were also arteries of the province, adding that one of them had been completely closed.
Subsequently, the court adjourned further hearing till November 21 and directed the respondents to file their replies by the next date of hearing. The petitioner submitted that if PTI was not stopped from the long march, then there might be anarchy in the country. He submitted that the Constitution did not allow anyone to disrupt commercial activities and peace.
He pleaded with the court to direct the respondents to stop the PTI’’s protests and long march besides seeking directions to make arrangements for the protection of life and liberty of the business community and public at large.
-
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham? -
Meghan Trainor Reveals Why Surrogacy Was The 'safest' Choice -
Victoria Beckham Supports Youngest Son In First Move Since Brooklyn's Rebellion -
'Percy Jackson' Star Feels Relieved After Season Two Finale -
Jelly Roll Reveals How Weight Loss Changed Him As A Dad: 'Whole Different Human' -
Prince Harry Gets Emotional During Trial: Here's Why -
Queen Camilla Supports Charity's Work On Cancer With Latest Visit -
Dove Cameron Opens Up About Her Latest Gig Alongside Avan Jogia -
Petition Against Blake Lively PGA Letter Gains Traction After Texts With Taylor Swift Revealed -
Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion: All-cash Offer -
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court -
David, Victoria Beckham 'quietly' Consulting Advisers After Brooklyn Remarks: 'Weighing Every Move' -
Meta's New AI Team Delivered First Key Models -
Prince Harry Defends Friends In London Court -
AI May Replace Researchers Before Engineers Or Sales