Controversial tweets case: Govt moves IHC for cancellation of Swati’s bail
The ruling coalition moved the IHC, seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets
ISLAMABAD: The ruling coalition Wednesday moved the Islamabad High Court (IHC), seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets.
The federal government filed the plea in the IHC through Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) Technical Officer Anees-ur-Rehman. In its plea, the government mentioned that Special Judge, Central, Raja Asif Mehmood, had exceeded his authority and granted bail to Swati.
The judge had granted bail to the senior PTI leader last month against surety bonds worth Rs1 million, more than a week after the anti-corruption watchdog had arrested him. Senator Swati was taken into custody by the FIA’s Cybercrime Wing (CCW) from his home in Islamabad on October 13 after registering a case against him over his controversial tweets. “The court was competent only to the extent of PECA 2016 and not other sections of PPC but, while exercising powers on all sections, the court travelled beyond jurisdiction. Hence, the impugned order is illegal,” the plea said.
“That learned judge has ignored the above said provision and passed an order in a slipshod manner and in fact tried to escape the above said provision of law, hence, order is not sustainable and without jurisdiction.”
In the light of the arguments, the government requested the IHC to accept the petition at the earliest and the bail granted under sections 109 (punishment of abetment if the Act abetted committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 131 (Abetting mutiny, or attempting to seduce a soldier, sailor or airman from his duty), 500 (punishment for defamation), 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) be revoked. In a press conference a day earlier, the PTI leader alleged that he was taken to an unknown place where he was filmed during his custody.
-
'Confident' Prince Harry Breaks Silence After Returning To Britain -
James Gunn Reveals What Caused Wonder Woman Casting Rumors -
Tesla Emerges Early Winner As Canada Welcomes Chinese EVs: Here’s Why -
New Hope For People With Obesity As Failed Drug Offers Cure -
Prince Harry Considering ‘half-in, Half-out’ Royal Role Amid UK Trip? -
CBS Finally Airs Trump’s Full Interview 'pulled' Earlier After White House Threatens To Sue -
Robert Irwin Gets Honest About Being In South Africa After 'DWTS' Run In LA -
Queen Elizabeth’s Icy Response To Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein Scandal Revealed -
Trump Vows To Neutralize ‘Russian Threat’ From Greenland, Raising Arctic Stakes -
Green Day Revealed As Super Bowl 2026 Opening Act -
Trump's Greenland Tariff ‘blackmail’ Sparks EU Retaliation: Is ‘trade Bazooka’ Next? -
New Drug Shows Promise In Lowering Dangerous Blood Fats -
Real Reason Noah Schnapp Was Missing From Finn Wolfhard's 'SNL' Debut Revealed -
How Princes William, Harry Were Caught In Early Royal Controversy Involving Charles -
Prince Harry’s Absence Leaves Gap For Royal Family Among Young People -
Karley Scott Collins Breaks Silence On Keith Urban Dating Rumours