Controversial tweets case: Govt moves IHC for cancellation of Swati’s bail
The ruling coalition moved the IHC, seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets
ISLAMABAD: The ruling coalition Wednesday moved the Islamabad High Court (IHC), seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets.
The federal government filed the plea in the IHC through Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) Technical Officer Anees-ur-Rehman. In its plea, the government mentioned that Special Judge, Central, Raja Asif Mehmood, had exceeded his authority and granted bail to Swati.
The judge had granted bail to the senior PTI leader last month against surety bonds worth Rs1 million, more than a week after the anti-corruption watchdog had arrested him. Senator Swati was taken into custody by the FIA’s Cybercrime Wing (CCW) from his home in Islamabad on October 13 after registering a case against him over his controversial tweets. “The court was competent only to the extent of PECA 2016 and not other sections of PPC but, while exercising powers on all sections, the court travelled beyond jurisdiction. Hence, the impugned order is illegal,” the plea said.
“That learned judge has ignored the above said provision and passed an order in a slipshod manner and in fact tried to escape the above said provision of law, hence, order is not sustainable and without jurisdiction.”
In the light of the arguments, the government requested the IHC to accept the petition at the earliest and the bail granted under sections 109 (punishment of abetment if the Act abetted committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 131 (Abetting mutiny, or attempting to seduce a soldier, sailor or airman from his duty), 500 (punishment for defamation), 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) be revoked. In a press conference a day earlier, the PTI leader alleged that he was taken to an unknown place where he was filmed during his custody.
-
Why Royal Lodge Fell Into Disarray Under Andrew: Insider Exposes Loophole -
Hoda Kotb 'so Proud' As Today 'magic Reignites' With Sheinelle Jones -
Kate Middleton Avoids Nanny Involvmenet In Prince George Matters -
Colin Jost Jokes About Scarlett Johansson Losing Highest-grossing Actor Crown To Zoe Saldana -
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’ -
Andrew’s Daughter Princess Eugenie Sparks Seismic Change After Stepping Away -
Meghan Markle Shares NEW Photos From Day Out At The Zoo -
'Game Of Thrones' New Series Returns To 'home' -
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos