Controversial tweets case: Govt moves IHC for cancellation of Swati’s bail
The ruling coalition moved the IHC, seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets
ISLAMABAD: The ruling coalition Wednesday moved the Islamabad High Court (IHC), seeking the cancellation of PTI leader Azam Swati’s bail in the case of controversial tweets.
The federal government filed the plea in the IHC through Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) Technical Officer Anees-ur-Rehman. In its plea, the government mentioned that Special Judge, Central, Raja Asif Mehmood, had exceeded his authority and granted bail to Swati.
The judge had granted bail to the senior PTI leader last month against surety bonds worth Rs1 million, more than a week after the anti-corruption watchdog had arrested him. Senator Swati was taken into custody by the FIA’s Cybercrime Wing (CCW) from his home in Islamabad on October 13 after registering a case against him over his controversial tweets. “The court was competent only to the extent of PECA 2016 and not other sections of PPC but, while exercising powers on all sections, the court travelled beyond jurisdiction. Hence, the impugned order is illegal,” the plea said.
“That learned judge has ignored the above said provision and passed an order in a slipshod manner and in fact tried to escape the above said provision of law, hence, order is not sustainable and without jurisdiction.”
In the light of the arguments, the government requested the IHC to accept the petition at the earliest and the bail granted under sections 109 (punishment of abetment if the Act abetted committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 131 (Abetting mutiny, or attempting to seduce a soldier, sailor or airman from his duty), 500 (punishment for defamation), 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) be revoked. In a press conference a day earlier, the PTI leader alleged that he was taken to an unknown place where he was filmed during his custody.
-
Prince Harry's Lawyer Tells Court Daily Mail Complicit In Unlawful Acts -
Meghan Markle Named In Epstein Files With Ghislaine Maxwell? -
Drunk Driver Tries To Snatch San Diego Deputy’s Gun During Chase -
After Surgery, Piers Morgan Reminded Of His Remarks About Meghan's Father's Hospitalization -
Idris Elba Gets Honest About Managing Real-life Hijack Situation -
Royal Family Buries King Charles' Cousin -
Elizabeth Hurley Faces An Impossible Choice As Son Damian, Beau Billy Ray Cyrus Clash -
Rare Pokémon Cards Worth $100k Stolen In New York Shop Robbery -
Chevy Chase Shares Disappointment After 'SNL50: The Anniversary Special' Snub -
Samuel L. Jackson's Old Movie Found New Life: Here's How -
Nobel Prize Snub Hardens Donald Trump's Tone On ‘peace’ -
What's Prince Harry's Case Against The Daily Mail's Publisher? -
'Matilda' Star Mara Wilson Breaks Silence On AI's 'deepfake Apocalypse' After Being Abused -
Meghan Markle 'ruined' Prince Harry's Life? -
Super Bowl Halftime Show Gets Another Attraction Besides Bad Bunny -
Princess Irene's Coffin Arrives For Funeral Rites