ended. The survivors of the bombings continued to suffer burns, infections, cancer and radiation sickness which ultimately resulted in another 160,000 deaths.
Almost 64 years have passed since that horrific incident but memories still hold on strongly, especially in the minds of the Japanese nation. The fact remains that the bombing of the two Japanese cities was not only unnecessary but also immoral. Japan was already on the verge of defeat and sane thinking on the part of the American high-ups could have prevented this tragedy. This event changed the whole world and introduced new elements in international politics.
The human race is now in a terrible predicament. It is in danger of a one-millisecond annihilation of all that has been built up over centuries of effort. The state of affairs has been more perilous than since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Today we are living in a world where the wrong decisions of one or two personalities will be enough to eradicate the existence of the human species from this planet.
Nuclear weapons have been produced in large numbers across the board, and a witless leader may order their use in a state of panic. During the Korean war there were three instances when President Kennedy pondered over the option of using nuclear weapons against China in order to gain victory.
Today, Russia and the US alone have almost 23,000 nuclear warheads. This staggering number constitutes almost 95 percent of the total nuclear arsenal in the world. Although the two major rivals have signed many agreements in the past on not using nuclear warheads in any situation, these agreements can’t ensure that they will not be used if the need arises.
Many argue that even a single incident of nuclear terrorism could forever change the world as we know it. Hundreds of metric tonnes of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and plutonium are used annually at nearly 350 different sites in more than 60 countries. This widespread use of HEU constitutes serious proliferation risks.
In the initials days President Obama, on his tour to Europe, talked about his dream of a nuclear-free world. But he himself pointed out that this was a very difficult task and would take much time. Palpable progress is possible only if his words are followed by concrete action. The critics of nuclear disarmament naively assert that the 65 years of nuclear non-use since Hiroshima and Nagasaki mean nukes will never be used and the world must accept the inevitability of the spread of nuclear weapons capabilities.
They very conveniently ignore the fact that national leaders sometimes act irresponsibly, to say nothing of the increasing dangers of nuclear terrorism. But policymakers continue to proceed as if the same incremental approach to limiting nuclear threats used for the last six decades will return the same results today – in our very different world.
Every nation has an interest in maintaining peaceful relations with other nations. Every country needs to play a role in creating a world free of nuclear threat. All the nuclear powers need to agree that they must eliminate all choices of using nuclear weapons in the future.
This can only happen by making the world free of nuclear warheads. A survivor of the atomic bombings in 1945 remarked, “This pain that we carry, let it end with us.”
Email: rizwanasghar5unm.edu