One of the more fascinating stories to emerge from the First World War relates to two Afridi brothers who won the highest military awards for gallantry – but from opposing countries. In March 1915 the Germans pinned the Iron Cross on Jemadar Mir Mast Qambarkhel Afridi while on April 26
Wilde’s Rifles. Mir Dast participated in many engagements but on April 26, 1915 enemy fire complemented by poison gas took a severe toll on the unit.
Mir Dast was the man of the moment. Wounded by enemy fire and affected by gas he was still instrumental in recovering eight badly wounded English and Indian officers from the battlefield. For his endeavours he was awarded the Victoria Cross. The king emperor personally pinned it on his chest.
After the war both brothers returned home to Tirah in the Khyber Agency. The Iron-Cross-holder never crossed paths with the government but Sir George Roos-Keppel, the chief commissioner, tried hard to corner him. Mir Must was determined to raise a force with Turkish and German assistance to resist the British. He even established contact with Haji Sahib of Turangzai who was fighting in the nearby Mohmand areas. The Victoria Cross veteran Mir Dust, on the other hand, was the toast of the country regaling the troops with his amazing war time experiences.
A century later two issues remain central to the tale, one physical and the moral. Physically without doubt both award holders were exceptionally daring men. The moral issue is more subjective. Mir Mast violated his oath by crossing over to the enemy but for a higher moral calling. Mir Dast was honour-bound to his oath and always felt he had ‘merely performed my duty’.
Is there a dilemma locked in? I know what I would have done in similar circumstances. How do you feel about it?
The writer is a former Khyber political agent and has served as chief secretary GB, AJK, NWFP and Sindh.
Email: shakildurraniymail.com