Prince William and Kate Middleton’s latest move to Forest Lodge has stirred up more than just autumn leaves.
What was billed as an eco-conscious, nature loving family relocation has sparked fresh controversy with locals pointing out that far more parkland has been closed off than initially disclosed.
In total, 60 hectares previously open to the public are now off limits, along with a tourist car park, two local roads, and an environmental centre run by the Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust, where schoolchildren once learned about nature firsthand.
A new taxpayer funded police cordon adds to the restricted access, leaving ramblers and dog walkers feeling left out in the cold.
The Palace insists that William’s environmental crusade and Kate’s “nature is healing” initiatives are the driving force, with William championing veganism and sustainability, and Kate encouraging the public to embrace forest bathing and other outdoor pursuits.
But critics aren’t buying it especially as whispers grow that the couple’s true motive is tied to Royal Lodge.
Sources according to The Observer suggest the Waleses’ alleged wariness of Prince Andrew conveniently coincides with their desire for the neighboring estate, long shared with Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.
Andrew, who invested millions into maintaining Royal Lodge, is expected to demand compensation and an alternative residence making the seemingly serene Forest Lodge move anything but straightforward.
Meanwhile, the Crown Estate says it’s “working closely” with the wildlife trust to find alternative sites for educational projects, but for many locals, the idyllic image of a green, happy royal family now comes with a hefty dose of reality.
Prince Andrew may have the offer of a grand pad in Abu Dhabi, courtesy of the ruling family there, but insiders think the he is unlikely to pack his bags.
Friends point out that his devotion to daughters Beatrice and Eugenie and their children will probably keep him rooted in Britain.
Fortunately, the royal real estate portfolio has options aplenty. Charles oversees a staggering 360 properties across the taxpayer- funded occupied royal palaces estate, from Buckingham and Kensington Palaces to St James’s, Clarence House, Windsor Castle, and countless apartments tucked into their grounds.
Veteran royal commentator Joe Little suggests a home within the Windsor Castle estate or nearby Crown Estate land is more likely.
“London is too public. Kensington Palace would be a goldfish bowl,” he quipped.
“The royal household will want him as invisible as possible preferably within a security perimeter with police protection.”