PHC issues notice to EC over change of constituency number
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday put on notice the Election Commission of Pakistan to submit a reply in a writ petition challenging the number of a constituency from NA-1, Peshawar, to NA-31.
A division bench comprising Justice Syed Muhammad Attique Shah and Justice Syed Arshad Ali issued a notice in the writ petition filed by the senior leader of Awami National Party Ghulam Ahmad Bilour. He has sought an order of the court to retain the old number of his constituency as NA-1.
The petition was filed through Sangeen Khan advocate. The court fixed June 12 as next date of hearing.
During the hearing, the lawyer submitted that though the rule 10 of the elections rules, 2017, provides that the limitation of the constituencies shall start from the northern end of the district. But the ECP, he said, has ‘wrongly’ extended this principle to the numerical order of the constituencies, which is ‘unwarranted’ and beyond the scope of rules and thus ‘illegal’ and ‘unlawful.’
The ECP has started the numbering of constituencies from the northern part of the country and granted NA-1 to Chitral district while the former NA 1, (Peshawar-III), was renumbered as NA-31 (Peshawar-V).
Bilour in his petition said that Peshawar is a historical city and his family and the residents of the city have a historical affiliation with the constituency of NA-1. “They’ve been taking pride to have been the first constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan,” he added.
He stated that the political and historical significance of the constituency evolved through decades of the electoral process and election in the country.
Late Benazir Bhutto and other heads of the party and former chief ministers have contested election from the same NA-1. In all previous delimitations, the constituency was named as NA-1 in numerical order of the constituencies of the National Assembly.
“The unnecessary and unwarranted change of number will only erase electoral history associated with this constituency,” he added.
The lawyer said the former numerical order was disbursed without any solid reason.
“The delimitation doesn’t necessitate the alteration of the number of a constituency. The change in the numerical order of the constituency is bereft of any rational jurisdiction,” he told the bench.
He added that it is settled law that every judicial and administrative authority is obliged to furnish proper reasons before making any such change, but alteration is devoid of any reasonable reason and justification.
Because the ECP has failed to cite any proper administration or technical justification in changing the numbers of the constituencies, the constituency number should be allocated back to NA-31 (Peshawar-V).
-
'Sinners' Star Michael B. Jordan Drops His Clever Hack To Winning Oscar -
Prince Harry’s Turns To Archie, Lili Over King Charles’ Cancer Battle: ‘It Kills Him’ -
Are Humans Living In Simulation? Scientist Reveals Shocking Evidence -
King Charles Spends Shocking Sum On House With Bizarre Connection To Queen Camilla Vacation Home -
Anthropic Bolsters ‘responsible AI’ Guardrails Against Chemical And Explosive Threat Risks: Here’s Why -
Princesses Beatrice, Eugenie’s Marriages Are In Real Trouble: ‘Their Worlds Are Falling Apart’ -
Jamie Lee Curtis Opens Up About Nicole Kidman's 'Scarpetta' Role In 'awful' Confession -
Kent Meningitis Outbreak: Mother Makes Plea To End ‘withholding’ Of Critical Vaccines -
Huang Unveils Groq-powered AI System As Nvidia Eyes $1 Trillion Market By 2027 -
'Invincible' Season 4 And 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' Trailer Set For Release Clash? -
Meghan Markle Takes Matters Into Her Own Hands Going ‘gung-ho’: ‘People Just Love To Find Fault' -
Zendaya Responds To Viral AI Images Of Her Wedding With Tom Holland -
Scientists Discover Strange ‘molten Slush’ Alien Planet Unlike Any Known World -
Nicole Kidman's Daughter Sunday Rose Unleashes 'biggest' Blow On Dad Keith Urban -
Musk’s XAI Sued Over Allegations Grok Generated Sexualized Images Of Minors -
King Charles DID Have A Conversation With Andrew On Jeffrey Epstein: Here’s What Happened