Wed, May 22, 2013, Rajab ul murajjab 11, 1434 A.H. : Last updated 2 hours ago
 
 
Group Chairman: Mir Javed Rahman

Editor-in-Chief: Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman
 
 
You are here: Home > News > National
 
 

Place my name and Riaz's on ECL: Arsalan
 


June 11, 2012 - Updated 1555 PKT
From Web Edition
 
 



ISLAMABAD: Arsalan Iftikhar told the Supreme Court on Monday that his and Malik Riaz’s name should be placed on the Exit Control List and they should be sent to prison. The court warned Arsalan Iftikhar from speaking like this.

 

A two member bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and Justice Khilji Arif Hussain resumed hearing of the suo moto case regarding accusations of dubious transactions between the Chief Justice’s son, Arsalan Iftikhar Chaudhry and business baron Malik Riaz Hussain.

 

During proceedings, Arsalan Iftikhar informed the court that his father (Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry) had barred him from their residence. He requested the court to provide him security as Malik Riaz or anyone else could harm him. The court directed the Attorney General and Secretary Interior to provide security to Arsalan.

 

At one point, the bench reprimanded Dr Arsalan for speaking in spite of the presence of his counsel.

 

Malik Riaz’s counsel Zahid Bukhari informed the court that his client would not take any steps which would harm Arsalan Iftikhar.

 

During the hearing Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said that till now the case is only based on allegations by a few people, out of which two people including Geo News senior anchors Hamid Mir and Kamran Khan have already given their statements in court. Three others said that something wrong had transpired. Malik Riaz had told these people that money was given to Arsalan Iftikhar. Justice Jawwad added that if this was a conspiracy it would be proven during the course of the trial.

 

Zahid Bukari requested the bench to form a commission similar to the memo commission to probe this matter. Bukhari informed the bench that his client Malik Riaz wanted to come to the court and record his statement and requested two days time. The bench told Bukhari to inform his client that he had been ordered to record his statement.

 

The bench emphasized that Malik Riaz should record his statement, but Bukhari argued that his client was ill and would submit his statement after two days.

 

Ali Zafar appeared as the counsel for Bahria Town during the proceedings. Zafar informed the bench that Secretary Bahria Town could not appear in the court to which Justice Jawaad remarked that this was the court and should not be turned into Bahria Town.

 

FBR submitted Malik Riaz’s tax returns to the court. A member of the FBR legal team informed the bench that all income tax returns could not be submitted due to a lack of time. The court ordered that tax returns for Bahira Town and Partnerships should be submitted on Tuesday and should be till 15 May 2012.

 

The Supreme Court also issued a notice for the third time to Ali Riaz Malik to appear before the bench on Tuesday when the hearing of the case resumes.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reader Comments
I think this is a conspricy against Arslan,gvt wants to devote the attention of the people

aqib nawaz
Pakistan
No one can accept that an eastern father will not be aware of his 31 years lonely son about his businesswhich he started from zero,

mukhtar sakhfi
Saudi Arabia
Malik Riaz is telling lie.He was simple junior clerk in MES how he became richman.

zafar
Bahrain
I can only comment that being well-wisher of Pakistan, we should respect/support honest Supreme Court, which is the only Department left standing firm against the criminals. We should not repeat mistake of loosing Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. If we keep on doing bad with our heros, like Qaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Liaquat Ali Khan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Dr. Kadir Khan and presently with Chief Justice, I am sure that we donot deserve an independent land.

Zaheer
Norway
We need to revisit the case presented about Arsalan frolics by Naeem Bukhari and forwarded by Shoukat Aziz and try to find the missing links. After all, "Wali ke ghar shaitan" is no any exception in our midst.

M.Saeed
Pakistan
We need to revisit the case presented about Arsalan frolics by Naeem Bukhari and forwarded by Shoukat Aziz and try to find the missing links. After all, "Wali ke ghar shaitan" is no any exception in our midst.

M.Saeed
Pakistan
 
 
 Post Your Comments  (6)
 
 
Name:        
Email:
 
 
 
Country:     
 
 
 
Enter Code:  
 
 
 
 
If you are facing problem in submitting your comments, please click here to report your problem.