Sun, May 19, 2013, Rajab ul murajjab 08, 1434 A.H. : Last updated 3 hours ago
 
 
Group Chairman: Mir Javed Rahman

Editor-in-Chief: Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman
 
 
You are here: Home > News > National
 
 

SC rejects Haqqani's video link plea
 


April 24, 2012 - Updated 1331 PKT
From Web Edition
 
 



ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday disposed of Husain Haqqani's application seeking recording of his statement via video link from abroad by empowering the Judicial Commission probing the memo case to decide the matter itself.

 

It observed that it was upto the commision to record the testimony of Haqqani from abroad or summon him in the country for the purpose.

 

The court in its order stated "the order of Supreme Court, on January 30, 2012 is intact, the commission without prejudice in the case of any body may adopt a procedure for recording of statement in the interest of justice as desired by it".

 

The nine-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry resumed hearing of the application filed by Hussain Haqqani through his counsel Asma Jahangir, seeking recording of his statement via video in abroad.

 

During the proceedings, Asma Jahangir apprised the bench that the apex Court's order dated January 30 did not bar the commission to extend the same facility to Hussain Haqqani which was given to Mansoor Ijaz regarding the recording of statement via vide link. However, juctice was not done to her client by denying the video link facility.

 

Asma pointed out that there was nothing left against her client in the case as Mansoor in his statement recorded to the commission, had admitted that he drafted the memo himself not Haqqani.

 

She contended that Haqqani always cooperated with the commission and requested for recording Haqqani's statement in abroad. (APP)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reader Comments
What lawyer and what law??? all BS...why the hell this case is prolonged like this..if they beleive that Mansoor is a trustworthy person then why they removed haqani from ECL?? I'm sorry but I have bad experience with Pakistan judicial system and many people wont like it but 95% lawyers are liars in Pakistan AND JUSTICE ALWAYS DELAYED, WHAT DOES IT MEAN?? I'm sorry if am culprit of contempt of court..

Naeem Amin Sabir
Malaysia
when he and his consuel promised that haqqani appeared when ever ask to then why he is refusing to appear and how could his lawyer defending his decision

hamid
UAE
@Zulfiqar: When you say ‘constitution’ and ‘legal process of Pakistan’, what actually you mean by that?

Zahid
United Kingdom
Is there one attorney in Pakistan who could leave a mark in history for the right reasons.Our history is replete with crooks, Some of whom rose to the higher benches and have left behind a trail of poor ,even wrong judgements for self gratification. Currently two big names are contesting cases against big wigs and are trying to bend the law to get these people freed.They forward arguments exposing their dishonesty and one can see their true minuscule sizes- a very poor show indeed.

A K Siddiqi
United Kingdom
He is not coming back to PAKISTAN

Jay
Canada
Well done, the Supreme Court! Haqqani is common Pakistani, and has to obey the constitution and legal process of the country. He must be ordered to be present in person all through the trial of the case. It is time all are treated equally in the law of the land.

Zulfiqar
Pakistan
Well done, the Supreme Court! Haqqani is common Pakistani, and has to obey the constitution and legal process of the country. He must be ordered to be present in person all through the trial of the case. It is time all are treated equally in the law of the land.

Zulfiqar
Pakistan
 
 
 Post Your Comments  (7)
 
 
Name:        
Email:
 
 
 
Country:     
 
 
 
Enter Code:  
 
 
 
 
If you are facing problem in submitting your comments, please click here to report your problem.