Reference against Qazi Faez: Govt-opposition face off hypes
ISLAMABAD: The increase in the number of Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges agreed between the government and opposition fell victim to their renewed tussle, which intensified by the filing of a reference against reputed Supreme Court Judge, Justice Qaze Faez Isa.
The opposition’s ire, hyped by the reference, was amply reflected by the Senate when it put its foot down by rejecting an amendment to the IHC act, seeking raise in the tally of IHC justices from six to ten.
In addition, the opposition-dominated Senate, voicing its concern over the move, approved a resolution calling for its withdrawal by President Dr Arif Alvi, who serves as a post office to send the reference to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC).
These two developments took place at the same time with the small treasury benches of the ruling coalition protesting. However, because of its numerical superiority in the Upper House of Parliament, the opposition prevailed, and Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani had to go with it as required under the rules.
The embarrassment and pressure faced by the government underlined once again that such activities can’t be stopped in the Senate unless there is at least a working relationship between the government and the opposition.
While the National Assembly will take up the explosive issue of the reference in its next session because the ongoing session was suddenly prorogued sine die amid intense pandemonium, the Senate quickly vented out its views on the move against the famed apex court judge.
During his incumbency, outgoing Chief Justice Saqib Nisar had recommended increase in the number of IHC judges. In January this year, he remarked that it has been four months since the incumbent government took over reins of the country, but it could not pass one bill. The Islamabad advocate general informed him during the hearing of a case pertaining to increasing number of IHC justices that the federal cabinet has accepted the recommendation.
At this, the chief justice said he should be told through proper channel as to what legislation had been made. He directed the advocate general to inquire about the matter from the law secretary, saying that the IHC was unable to function in the current situation. He further directed him for tabling of the draft legislation prepared by the government in parliament. He said the present IHC judges were greatly burdened.
Keeping in view the chief justice’s remarks, the government prepared the bill and got it passed from the National Assembly. However, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Rana Sanaullah had argued in the National Assembly Standing Committee on law when it had taken up this bill that the number of judges in all the high courts should also be increased and such a raise should not be confined to the IHC only.
Despite PML-N’s reservations, the Senate Standing Committee on Law and Justice, on May 16, 2019, approved the bill when it had met under the chairmanship of PML-N Senator Javed Abbasi. Generally, when a bill is passed by a House body, it earns approval of the concerned House without much problem. But, in the instant case the government-opposition tussle over the reference against Justice Faez Isa disappeared the agreement in the Senate panel over the IHC bill.
The Senate also mirrored its anger through the resolution that termed the filing of the reference mala fide and politically-motivated. It denounced the move against the upright and independent judges and described it as a direct attack on the independence of judiciary, aimed at stifling the voices of reason, truth and justice in the highest judiciary. The Senate expressed full solidarity with the judiciary, lawyers’ elected representatives and bar councils.
-
Winona Ryder Lands Secret Role In 'Wednesday' Season Three, Marking Reunion With Tim Burton -
Andrew, Fergie’s Life Without The Bells And Whistles Turns Grimmer: ‘A Lot More Was Happening’ -
Nicole Kidman And Keith Urban's Divorce Drama Deepens As Teen Daughters 'stick' By Their Mother's Side -
William, Kate Desperate To Make Public Statement Distancing Themselves From Andrew -
Charli Xcx Details Boozy Second Wedding To The 1975's George Daniel: 'Everyone Was Hungover' -
Gracie Abrams Follows 'Kylie Jenner Playbook' With Paul Mescal Romance -
Dua Lipa Shares 'Love Letter' With New Boyfriend After Emily Ratajkowski Confirms Romance With Her Previous Beau -
Brazilian Beauty Influencer Passes Away After Suffering 'medical Emergency' -
Sarah Ferguson Turns Into A Bulldozer With Beatrice, Eugenie: ‘Help Me Out’ -
Australian Prime Minister's Letter Against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Made Public -
'Project Runway' Alum Tim Gunn Reveals Why He's Been Celibate For 43 Years -
Delroy Lindo Breaks Silence On John Davidson's Racial Slur Shock At 2026 BAFTA: 'We Did What We Had To Do' -
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’