N-deal with Pakistan will stop arms race: expert
LONDON: A prominent nuclear expert has said that the time is now for the western countries to offer
By Murtaza Ali Shah
April 04, 2014
LONDON: A prominent nuclear expert has said that the time is now for the western countries to offer nuclear normalisation to Pakistan to stop arms race and to end the ambiguities surrounding the nuclear production.
Mark Fitzpatrick, a former senior US diplomat, told audience at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) here on Thursday that the advantages of a nuclear deal with Pakistan far outweigh the disadvantages and there will be dividends if Pakistan is offered a similar deal on the lines of a 2005 deal with India which allowed normal access to commercial nuclear markets despite India’s refusal to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He was speaking in reference to the new IISS Adelphi book “Overcoming Pakistan’s Nuclear Dangers”.
He told The News: “If the western countries strike a nuclear deal with Pakistan then there are advantages for Pakistan and rest of the world. This will reduce nuclear tensions in the region and reduce the prospects of a nuclear war. A deal with Pakistan akin to the one the west has with India will help stop arms race. Pakistan today is at a disadvantage compared with India capability. Pakistan has a huge disadvantage when compared with India especially in the context of India’s greater potential as India can produce more nuclear weapons. It will be productive for all if this situation was frozen today.” Mark Fitzpatrick, who is director of the IISS Non-proliferation and Disarmament Programme, said that Pakistan should be able to match India’s nuclear power because Pakistan is at disadvantage because of the country’s smaller revenue sources.
He said there were fears about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenals and “there is a legitimate reason for these concerns”. He said America had nuclear accidents at nuclear reactors and “we had near misses with nuclear weapons and with nukes custody, it has been deplorable”.
He said when new countries acquire nuclear weapons then there is a greater potential for accidents. “That’s one of the reasons that there is a concern. Then there is of course the case of former nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeera Khan who sent the nuclear material abroad.
I don’t think it happens today and all of this adds to the concerns.”He said the confluence of terrorist groups also causes worry but he said it was well established that Pakistan military has strong control over nuclear weapons and while there is some potential that some nuclear material could fall into the hands of terrorists there is no danger that the militants could take over nuclear installations of Pakistan.
He said the west can gain advantage if it used nuclear normalization as a tool to positively shape Pakistan’s nuclear posture.Answering questions of the audience, he said that the dangers associated with Pakistan’s nuclear programme - including nuclear terrorism, accidents, an arms race, onward proliferation, and most worrisome of all, the potential for a nuclear war - can best be averted by offering Pakistan a path to nuclear normalcy.
Mark Fitzpatrick, a former senior US diplomat, told audience at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) here on Thursday that the advantages of a nuclear deal with Pakistan far outweigh the disadvantages and there will be dividends if Pakistan is offered a similar deal on the lines of a 2005 deal with India which allowed normal access to commercial nuclear markets despite India’s refusal to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He was speaking in reference to the new IISS Adelphi book “Overcoming Pakistan’s Nuclear Dangers”.
He told The News: “If the western countries strike a nuclear deal with Pakistan then there are advantages for Pakistan and rest of the world. This will reduce nuclear tensions in the region and reduce the prospects of a nuclear war. A deal with Pakistan akin to the one the west has with India will help stop arms race. Pakistan today is at a disadvantage compared with India capability. Pakistan has a huge disadvantage when compared with India especially in the context of India’s greater potential as India can produce more nuclear weapons. It will be productive for all if this situation was frozen today.” Mark Fitzpatrick, who is director of the IISS Non-proliferation and Disarmament Programme, said that Pakistan should be able to match India’s nuclear power because Pakistan is at disadvantage because of the country’s smaller revenue sources.
He said there were fears about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenals and “there is a legitimate reason for these concerns”. He said America had nuclear accidents at nuclear reactors and “we had near misses with nuclear weapons and with nukes custody, it has been deplorable”.
He said when new countries acquire nuclear weapons then there is a greater potential for accidents. “That’s one of the reasons that there is a concern. Then there is of course the case of former nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeera Khan who sent the nuclear material abroad.
I don’t think it happens today and all of this adds to the concerns.”He said the confluence of terrorist groups also causes worry but he said it was well established that Pakistan military has strong control over nuclear weapons and while there is some potential that some nuclear material could fall into the hands of terrorists there is no danger that the militants could take over nuclear installations of Pakistan.
He said the west can gain advantage if it used nuclear normalization as a tool to positively shape Pakistan’s nuclear posture.Answering questions of the audience, he said that the dangers associated with Pakistan’s nuclear programme - including nuclear terrorism, accidents, an arms race, onward proliferation, and most worrisome of all, the potential for a nuclear war - can best be averted by offering Pakistan a path to nuclear normalcy.
-
Lawyer Of Epstein Victims Speaks Out Directly To King Charles, Prince William, Kate Middleton -
Microsoft CEO Shares How Gates Doubted $1bn OpenAI Investment -
Milo Ventimiglia Calls Fatherhood 'pretty Wild Experience' As He Expects Second Baby With Wife Jarah Mariano -
Chinese Scientists Unveil Advanced AI Model To Support Deep-space Exploration -
Anthropic’s New AI Tool Wipes Billions Off Cybersecurity Stocks -
Trump Announces He Is Sending A Hospital Ship To Greenland Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions -
'Never Have I Ever' Star Maitreyi Ramakrishnan Lifts The Lid On How She Avoids Drama At Coffee Shops Due To Her Name -
Inside Prince William’s Plans For Prince Harry: What Will Happen To Duke Once He’s King -
Chyler Leigh Pays Moving Homage To 'Grey’s Anatomy' Co-star Eric Dane: 'He Was Amazing' -
Did You Know Tech CEOs Limit Screen Time For Their Own Kids? -
Matthew Lillard Admits Fashion Trends Are Not His 'forte' -
SpaceX Launches Another Batch Of Satellites From Cape Canaveral During Late-night Mission On Saturday -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Get Pulled Into Parents’ Epstein Row: ‘At Least Stop Clinging!’ -
Inside Kim Kardashian's Brain Aneurysm Diagnosis -
Farmers Turn Down Millions As AI Data Centres Target Rural Land -
Trump Announces A Rise In Global Tariffs To 15% In Response To Court Ruling, As Trade Tensions Intensify