SHC reserves judgment in Daniel Pearl kidnapping and murder case
The Sindh High Court on Friday reserved its judgment on the appeals of four convicts in the kidnapping and murder case of American journalist Daniel Pearl after hearing the arguments of the appellants and the state counsel.
British national Ahmed Omer Sheikh was sentenced to death for kidnapping and killing the journalist, and his three accomplices – Fahad Naseem, Syed Salman Saqib and Sheikh Mohammad Adil – were sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs500,000 each by a Hyderabad anti-terrorism court on July 15, 2002.
Pearl, a US national and the South Asian region bureau chief of the Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped on January 23, 2002, in Karachi and later beheaded by his captors when their demands were not met.
Appellants counsel Rai Bashir and Khawaja Naveed Ahmed submitted that the prosecution had miserably failed to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt against accused Ahmed and co-appellants as Ahmed had neither aided, abetted, participated in the alleged crime nor had he made any conspiracy for kidnapping for ransom after which the US journalist was murdered.
They submitted that the prosecution witnesses in the case against the accused are mostly policemen and their testimonies could not be relied upon.
They said the recovery of a laptop computer with e-mails and messages foisted on the appellants Fahad Naseem and Adil Sheikh, and their confessions before the judicial magistrate were defective and not voluntary. They said there was no eyewitness of the case and the prosecution relied upon very weak circumstantial evidences which were created by the prosecution.
They said the recovery of the laptop computer was shown from appellant Fahad on February 11, 2002 while computer expert Ronald Joseph had deposed that he was given the computer for verification on February 4 and he examined the laptop for six days and such evidence could not be relied upon and requested the court to set aside the conviction.
Deputy prosecutor general Saleem Akhtar supported the anti-terrorism court judgment and submitted that the prosecution proved its case against the appellants beyond any shadow of doubt and requested the court to dismiss the appeals.
The SHC’s division bench, headed by Justice Mohammad Karim Khan Agha, after hearing the arguments of the counsel reserved the judgment.
Hashim and other co-accused – Asim alias Qasim, Hassan, Ahmed Bhai, Imtiaz Siddiqui and Amjad Farooqui – were declared proclaimed offenders by the court. The appeals of the convicts have been pending with the SHC since 2002.
-
Philippines Blocks Elon Musk’s Grok AI -
Jennifer Lawrence Blames Internet For Losing Sharon Tate Role -
DeepMind, Google CEOs Sync Daily To Accelerate AI Race Against OpenAI -
Japan Launches Probe Into 'Grok AI' Following Global Scrutiny Over 'inappropriate' Content -
Prince Harry All Set To Return To Britain Next Week? -
Is Princess Charlotte Becoming Most Confident Young Royal? -
‘Stranger Things’ Star David Harbour Speaks Up About ‘psychotherapy’ -
Jennifer Love Hewitt Talks About Scary 9-1-1 Episode -
Kate Middleton Ditches Palace Life For Where She 'truly Relaxes' -
Pixel Watch May Soon Warn You If You Leave It Behind -
Serious Liver Scarring Shows Potential To Be Reversed With Latest Drug -
Elon Musk Backs Donald Trump To Invoke Insurrection Act Amid Minnesota Protests -
Scientists Unravel Mystery Of James Webb’s ‘little Red Dots’ In Deep Space -
Nano Banana Explained: How Google’s AI Got Its Name -
Fire Causes Power Outage On Tokyo Train Lines, Thousands Stranded As ‘operations Halted’ -
YouTube, BBC To Ink Landmark Deal To Launch Exclusive Bespoke Shows