Sun, May 19, 2013, Rajab ul murajjab 08, 1434 A.H. : Last updated 2 hours ago
 
 
Group Chairman: Mir Javed Rahman

Editor-in-Chief: Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sunday, August 05, 2012
From Print Edition
 
 

 

KARACHI: The APNS has rejected the rejoinder of the Information and Culture Department, Government of the Punjab, as a pack of distorted facts relating to the DGPR/Midas payment issue.

 

The APNS, in a press release, has stated that the Information and Culture Department, Government of the Punjab, has conveniently ignored and distorted the facts of the case and issued a press release to mislead and prejudice the public opinion.

 

The APNS in order to set the record straight has stated that the Joint Committee of the APNS and the Punjab government held only one inaugural meeting wherein the TORs and issues to be handled by the Joint Committee were deliberated and framed. The Joint Committee had decided that the Auditor General of Pakistan will be requested for the audit of the accounts of the DGPR and prepare a report to be submitted within 45 days to the committee. The APNS asserted that no report of the Auditor General was ever placed before the Joint Committee as it was never convened again.

 

The audit report referred by the Punjab Information Department was not issued by the Auditor General but was proposed draft paras of audit by the Director General Audit, Punjab. The objections raised and the deficiencies mentioned in the proposed draft paras were duly answered by the DGPR which has not been mentioned in the statement of the Punjab Information.

 

The APNS vide its letter dated November 12, 2011 had stated that the audit paras relate to the DGPR Punjab and the Information Department and do not pertain to M/s Midas (Pvt) Ltd. The APNS reminded that vide letter dated March 19, 2011 it had requested the Secretary Information Punjab that the audit report should be placed before the Committee which was never convened. The APNS also requested to forward the complete audit report of the Auditor General for the perusal of the APNS and suggested an independent audit by KPMG or AF Ferguson & Co. The request was not even acknowledged.

 

The APNS had also requested the Punjab chief minister on July 24, 2012 to advise the convener Joint Committee to hold a meeting of the committee instead of lodging an FIR against the agency as it would be perceived as political victimization. It is regretted that the APNS request was grossly ignored.

 

The APNS reiterated that the Punjab chief minister should immediately intervene in the interest of cordial relations between the media and the Punjab government as bypassing the consultative procedure and resorting to police action would badly reflect upon the Press-Punjab govt relations and damage the economies of the print media across the country.